Dayez J
Service d'Orthopédie, Centre Hospitalier de la région annécienne 1, Annecy.
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1999 Jun;85(3):238-44.
Can medial plating of the humerus, through an antero lateral approach, diminish incidence of iatrogenic radial palsies?
We carried out a prospective study of medial plating of humeral shaft fractures through an antero lateral approach between 1988 and 1997. 41 fractures were fixed, 36 were followed up for a mean period of 5.8 years. The indications were multiple injuries (10), displaced fractures (23), and failure of conservative treatment (3). Road traffic accidents and sports injuries were the cause in 68 per cent of cases. Two fractures were open and in 9 cases there was a radial palsy. Bone graft was never used. The approach to the medial aspect of the humerus an antero lateral incision was the essential feature of the technique. After a slightly curved incision on the antero lateral aspect of the arm, the space between biceps and brachialis anterior was bluntly dissected. The assistant holded the elbow flexed in order to relax the biceps and rotated il laterally to expose the medial aspect of the bone. Splitting brachialis fibres longitudinally exposed the fracture site. It was easy to check if the radial nerve was trapped and, if not, the nerve seen during the operation. Postoperatively patients were given a simple sling and mobilised freely, including rotation.
We had no intra-operative complications, no infections, no fixation failure, no post operative radial palsies and no non-unions. Results were excellent in 89 per cent of cases (full recovery of pain free range of movement). Four patient had a restriction of elbow movements of 10 degrees but without any discomfort. The mean time to union was 80 days. All radial nerve palsies recovered between 24 hours and 1 year. The plate was removed in 11 cases. Iatrogenic complications of humeral plating have led to the increased popularity of intramedullary nailing. Even if secondary radial palsies and non-unions have decreased, union of the humeral shafts is often difficult. Placing the plate into the medial surface allowed to preserve the radial nerve, but still permitted to check its continuity when it was trapped in the fracture site.
Restoration of the length and rotational alignment of the humerus puts the radial nerve in the best condition for its recovery. An antero lateral approach and a medially placed plate allowed to avoid secondary radial plasies and non-unions, which can complicate internal fixation of the humeral shaft.
通过前外侧入路对肱骨进行内侧钢板固定,能否降低医源性桡神经麻痹的发生率?
我们对1988年至1997年间采用前外侧入路对肱骨干骨折进行内侧钢板固定的情况进行了一项前瞻性研究。共固定了41例骨折,其中36例进行了平均5.8年的随访。适应证包括多发伤(10例)、移位骨折(23例)和保守治疗失败(3例)。68%的病例病因是道路交通事故和运动损伤。2例骨折为开放性骨折,9例存在桡神经麻痹。从未使用过骨移植。采用前外侧切口显露肱骨内侧是该技术的关键特征。在手臂前外侧做一个略呈弧形的切口后,钝性分离肱二头肌和肱肌之间的间隙。助手将肘部屈曲以放松肱二头肌,并将其向外旋转以暴露骨的内侧。纵向劈开肱肌纤维可显露骨折部位。很容易检查桡神经是否受压,若未受压,术中可看到神经。术后患者使用简单吊带,可自由活动,包括旋转。
我们没有术中并发症、感染、内固定失败、术后桡神经麻痹和骨不连。89%的病例结果优良(疼痛消失且活动范围完全恢复)。4例患者肘部活动受限10度,但无任何不适。平均愈合时间为80天。所有桡神经麻痹均在24小时至1年内恢复。11例取出了钢板。肱骨钢板固定的医源性并发症导致髓内钉的应用日益普遍。即使继发性桡神经麻痹和骨不连有所减少,但肱骨干的愈合仍常常困难。将钢板置于内侧表面可保护桡神经,但当神经被困于骨折部位时仍可检查其连续性。
恢复肱骨的长度和旋转对线可为桡神经恢复创造最佳条件。前外侧入路和内侧放置钢板可避免继发性桡神经麻痹和骨不连,而这些情况会使肱骨干内固定复杂化。