Nehler Mark R, Coll Joseph R, Hiatt William R, Regensteiner Judith G, Schnickel Gabriel T, Klenke William A, Strecker Pam K, Anderson Michelle W, Jones Darrell N, Whitehill Thomas A, Moskowitz Shevie, Krupski William C
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Department of Surgery, Vascular Surgery Section, Denver, CO 80262, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Jul;38(1):7-14. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00092-2.
We undertook this study to document the functional natural history of patients undergoing major amputation in an academic vascular surgery and rehabilitation medicine practice.
A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients undergoing major lower extremity amputation and rehabilitation in a university and Department of Veterans Affairs hospital. Main outcome variables included operative mortality, follow-up, survival, median time to incision healing, secondary operative procedures for wound management, and conversion from below-knee amputation (BKA) to above-knee amputation (AKA). For surviving patients, quality of life was determined by degree of ambulation, eg, outdoors, indoors only, or no ambulation; use of a prosthesis; and independence, eg, community housing or nursing facility.
From August 1997 through March 2002, 154 patients (130 men; median age, 62 years) underwent 172 major amputations, 78 AKA and 94 BKA, because of either critical limb ischemia (87%) or diabetic neuropathy (13%). Thirty-day operative mortality was 10%. Mean follow-up was 14 months. Healing at 100 and 200 days, as determined with the Kaplan-Meier method, was 55% and 83%, respectively, for BKA, and 76% and 85%, respectively, for AKA. Twenty-three BKA and 16 AKA required additional operative revision, and 18 BKA ultimately were converted to AKA. Survival was 78% at 1 year and 55% at 3 years. Function in surviving patients at 10 and 17 months, respectively, was as follows: 21% and 29% of patients ambulated outdoors, 28% and 25% ambulated indoors only, and 51% and 46% of patients were nonambulatory; 32% and 42% of patients used prosthetic limbs; and 17% and 8% of patients who lived in the community before amputation required care in a nursing facility.
We were surprised to find that vascular patients in a contemporary setting who require major lower extremity amputation and rehabilitation often remain independent despite infrequent prosthesis use and outdoor ambulation. Although any hope for postoperative ambulation in this population requires salvaging the knee joint, because of the morbidity incurred in both wound healing and rehabilitation efforts, aggressive effort should be reserved for selected patients at good risk. Ability to predict ambulation after BKA in the vascular population is poor.
我们开展这项研究,以记录在学术性血管外科和康复医学实践中接受大截肢手术患者的功能自然史。
对一所大学及退伍军人事务部医院连续接受下肢大截肢手术及康复治疗的患者进行回顾性研究。主要结局变量包括手术死亡率、随访、生存率、切口愈合中位时间、伤口处理的二次手术、以及从膝下截肢(BKA)转为膝上截肢(AKA)。对于存活患者,生活质量由行走程度决定,例如户外行走、仅室内行走或无法行走;假体使用情况;以及独立性,例如社区居住或护理机构居住。
1997年8月至2002年3月,154例患者(130例男性;中位年龄62岁)接受了172次大截肢手术,其中78例为AKA,94例为BKA,原因是严重肢体缺血(87%)或糖尿病神经病变(13%)。30天手术死亡率为10%。平均随访时间为14个月。采用Kaplan-Meier法确定,BKA在100天和200天的愈合率分别为55%和83%,AKA分别为76%和85%。23例BKA和16例AKA需要额外的手术修复,18例BKA最终转为AKA。1年生存率为78%,3年生存率为55%。存活患者在10个月和17个月时的功能情况分别如下:21%和29%的患者可户外行走,28%和25%的患者仅可室内行走,51%和46%的患者无法行走;32%和42%的患者使用假肢;截肢前居住在社区的患者中,17%和8%需要在护理机构接受护理。
我们惊讶地发现,在当代环境中,需要进行下肢大截肢手术及康复治疗的血管疾病患者,尽管很少使用假肢且户外行走能力有限,但往往仍能保持独立。尽管该人群术后行走的任何希望都需要保留膝关节,但由于伤口愈合和康复过程中会出现并发症,应仅对选定的低风险患者采取积极措施。在血管疾病患者中,预测BKA后行走能力的能力较差。