Solinas Lucia, Raucci Rosa, Terrazzino Sergio, Moscariello Francesco, Pertoldi Franco, Vajto Sergio, Badano Luigi P
Emergency Department, Civic Hospital, Tolmezzo, UD.
Ital Heart J. 2003 May;4(5):318-24.
The evaluation and triage of patients with suspected myocardial ischemia in the emergency department is challenging and costly. In Italy there are no prospective data neither about the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcome of patients with chest pain in the emergency room, nor about the costs of their triage. Therefore, this study was undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and costs of the actual emergency department triage modalities of patients with acute chest pain.
We analyzed the clinical data from a multicenter, prospective study of all patients with chest pain who presented to the emergency department of three hospitals in North-Eastern Italy from April to October 1999.
Of 12,375 new medical admissions at the three emergency departments during the study period, 495 (prevalence 4%, mean age 62 +/- 16 years, 50% females) were for chest pain. Thirty-seven percent of the patients with chest pain were hospitalized with a suspected acute coronary syndrome, while 63% were directly discharged from the emergency department. The diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome was confirmed in 79% of hospitalized patients. Among the patients discharged directly from the emergency department 68% were immediately sent back home (69 +/- 60 min from admission) and 32% required a brief clinical observation lasting 10 +/- 6 hours and including serial electrocardiographic and myocardial injury marker assessment. The average cost of the emergency department triage was 189 +/- 237 [symbol: see text]/patient. The 1-month follow-up of the patients directly discharged from the emergency department revealed a 2.5% incidence of acute coronary syndromes (3 acute myocardial infarctions), but no deaths.
Data obtained from our multicenter observational study suggest that present triage modalities for patients with chest pain in the emergency department based on patient history, clinical data, electrocardiography, and myocardial injury marker assessment could be improved in terms of accuracy and efficacy. Our data provide the clinical and economical framework for the designation of trials of new accelerated critical pathways for chest pain evaluation in the emergency department.
急诊科对疑似心肌缺血患者的评估和分诊具有挑战性且成本高昂。在意大利,既没有关于急诊室胸痛患者的患病率、临床特征及转归的前瞻性数据,也没有关于其分诊成本的数据。因此,本研究旨在评估急性胸痛患者实际的急诊科分诊模式的诊断准确性和成本。
我们分析了一项多中心前瞻性研究的临床数据,该研究纳入了1999年4月至10月期间在意大利东北部三家医院急诊科就诊的所有胸痛患者。
在研究期间,三家急诊科的12375例新入院患者中,495例(患病率4%,平均年龄62±16岁,50%为女性)因胸痛入院。37%的胸痛患者因疑似急性冠状动脉综合征住院,而63%的患者直接从急诊科出院。79%的住院患者确诊为急性冠状动脉综合征。在直接从急诊科出院的患者中,68%立即回家(入院后69±60分钟),32%需要进行为期10±6小时的简短临床观察,包括连续心电图和心肌损伤标志物评估。急诊科分诊的平均成本为189±237[符号:见原文]/患者。对直接从急诊科出院的患者进行1个月随访发现,急性冠状动脉综合征的发生率为2.5%(3例急性心肌梗死),但无死亡病例。
我们多中心观察性研究获得的数据表明,目前基于患者病史、临床数据、心电图和心肌损伤标志物评估的急诊科胸痛患者分诊模式在准确性和有效性方面有待改进。我们的数据为制定急诊科胸痛评估新的加速关键路径试验提供了临床和经济框架。