Kumarasamy Y, Cadwgan T, Gillanders I A, Jappy B, Laing R, Gould I M
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003 May;9(5):406-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00577.x.
To study the quality and continuity of treatment in the Acute Medicines Assessment Unit (AMAU) with regard to empirical prescription of antibiotics, mode of administration, adherence to ward antibiotic policy, as well as collection, awareness and utilization of microbiological investigations.
A prospective study over a 3-month period at the AMAU, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary (ARI), a teaching hospital in north-eastern Scotland, was performed. The study included all patients started on empirical antibiotics on admission to the AMAU and followed up until their discharge.
Of 1303 patients admitted, 221 (17%) were started on empirical antibiotics. This was in accordance with hospital antibiotic policy in 52% of cases. Appropriate specimens were taken from 77% of patients. Culture results showed that 29% (n = 65) of the patients had clinically significant growth of organisms. Of the 65 patients with clinically significant culture results, 49% (n = 32) were on an inappropriate empirical regimen. In 55%, the medication was not changed to a more appropriate antibiotic. In 72% of the patients with a negative culture, the culture report had no obvious effect on the duration or type of antibiotic being administered. Intravenous antibiotics were used in 60% of patients.
This study demonstrates a significant overuse of antibiotics, especially intravenous forms, despite a paucity of positive sepsis parameters and chest X-ray findings in these patients The duration of treatment could be shortened and an early switch policy introduced if culture results and sepsis profiles were taken into consideration, as there was a large number of unproven infections. Suggestions are made about how these improvements in prescribing could be made within the current administrative set-up of AMAUs.
研究急性药物评估单元(AMAU)在抗生素经验性处方、给药方式、对病房抗生素政策的遵守情况以及微生物学检查的采集、知晓度和利用方面的治疗质量和连续性。
在苏格兰东北部的一家教学医院阿伯丁皇家医院(ARI)的AMAU进行了为期3个月的前瞻性研究。该研究纳入了所有在AMAU入院时开始使用经验性抗生素并随访至出院的患者。
在1303例入院患者中,221例(17%)开始使用经验性抗生素。其中52%的病例符合医院抗生素政策。77%的患者采集了合适的标本。培养结果显示,29%(n = 65)的患者有临床上有意义的微生物生长。在65例培养结果有临床意义的患者中,49%(n = 32)采用了不恰当的经验性治疗方案。55%的患者未更换为更合适的抗生素。在培养结果为阴性的患者中,72%的患者培养报告对所用抗生素的疗程或类型没有明显影响。60%的患者使用了静脉抗生素。
本研究表明,尽管这些患者中脓毒症阳性参数和胸部X线检查结果较少,但抗生素尤其是静脉用抗生素存在大量过度使用的情况。如果考虑培养结果和脓毒症特征,由于存在大量未经证实的感染,治疗疗程可以缩短并引入早期换药政策。针对如何在AMAU的当前管理架构内实现这些处方改进提出了建议。