Boos C, Thomas M D, Jones A, Clarke E, Wilbourne G, More R S
St Mary's Hospital, Milton Road, Portsmouth, PO3 6AD, UK.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2003 Apr;8(2):121-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1542-474x.2003.08205.x.
Electrical direct-current cardioversion (DCCV) has become a routine therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF), although some uncertainty remains regarding the optimal energy settings.
This study examines whether the use of a higher initial energy monophasic shock of 360 joules (J) for external DCCV, in patients with persistent AF would prove more effective, yet as safe, as the use of a lower initial energy 200 J shock.
A cohort of 107 patients with persistent AF was prospectively randomized to an initial synchronized DCCV shock of 360 J versus 200 J (n = 50 vs 57), followed by a similar shock sequence thereafter of four further shocks of 360 J for the two groups. In all patients the levels of troponin I (cTnI) were measured precardioversion and 18-20 hours later, the following day. In a subgroup of 36 patients in each group, the levels of creatine kinase (CK) and aspartate transaminase (AST) were measured pre- and 18-20 hours postcardioversion.
The success rate for DCCV was significantly higher in the 360 J group compared to the 200 J group (96.0% vs 75.4%, P = 0.003). The mean CK IU/L levels (1137.5.0 vs 2411.8, P = 0.014) and AST levels (39.83 vs 52.86, P = 0.010) were significantly lower in the 360 J group compared to the 200 J group. There was no statistical rise in cTnI (microg/L) in either group (P = 1.00). The average number of shocks delivered (1.84 vs 2.56, P = 0.006) was significantly less in the 360 J group than in the 200 J group, although total energy requirements for DCCV were similar for the two groups (662.4 J vs 762.4 J, P = 0.67).
For patients with persistent AF the use of a higher initial-energy monophasic shock of 360 J achieves a significantly greater success rate, with less skeletal muscle damage (and no cardiac muscle damage) as compared with the traditional starting energy of a 200 J DC shock.
尽管在最佳能量设置方面仍存在一些不确定性,但直流电心脏复律(DCCV)已成为心房颤动(AF)的常规治疗方法。
本研究旨在探讨对于持续性房颤患者,采用360焦耳(J)的较高初始能量单相电击进行体外DCCV治疗是否比使用200 J的较低初始能量电击更有效且同样安全。
将107例持续性房颤患者前瞻性随机分为初始同步DCCV电击360 J组和200 J组(n = 50 vs 57),然后两组后续均进行类似的电击序列,再进行四次360 J的电击。所有患者在心脏复律前及复律后18 - 20小时(次日)测量肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)水平。在每组36例患者的亚组中,测量心脏复律前及复律后18 - 20小时的肌酸激酶(CK)和天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)水平。
360 J组的DCCV成功率显著高于200 J组(96.0% vs 75.4%,P = 0.003)。360 J组的平均CK IU/L水平(1137.5 vs 2411.8,P = 0.014)和AST水平(39.83 vs 52.86,P = 0.010)显著低于200 J组。两组的cTnI(μg/L)均无统计学意义的升高(P = 1.00)。360 J组的平均电击次数(1.84 vs 2.56,P = 0.006)显著少于200 J组,尽管两组DCCV的总能量需求相似(66