Buhling Kai J, Henrich Wolfgang, Kjos Siri L, Siebert Gerda, Starr Elizabeth, Dreweck Christine, Stein Ursula, Dudenhausen Joachim W
Clinic of Obstetrics, Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Humboldt University, Augustenburger Platz 1,13353 Berlin, Germany.
Clin Biochem. 2003 Jul;36(5):333-7. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9120(03)00054-7.
Although glucose meters are well-established instruments for self-monitoring blood glucose levels, diagnostic and screening procedures should be performed using standard laboratory methods. In addition to standard laboratory methods, HemoCue is authorized for screening and diagnostic purposes in Germany. The rapid development of other glucose meters makes it necessary to re-evaluate this recommendation. Our objective was to test the usefulness of glucose meters in screening pregnant patients for gestational diabetes.
The 50-g glucose challenge test was administered to one hundred and ninety-three pregnant patients whose blood glucose levels were then simultaneously measured with five portable meters and the HemoCue. The results were compared to our standard method (Hexokinase). A cut-off of 7.8 mmol/L was used and sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, the Youden index, and the Kappa index were calculated. The tests were performed by well-trained personnel (C.D. and U.S.).
1212 measurements were performed on 193 patients. All glucose meters showed a very good correlation (r > 0.90). None of the measurements showed an extreme deviation necessitating the error grid analysis. The GlucoTouch (5.93% +/- 7.4) and the HemoCue (-9.04% +/- 5.9) showed a mean deviation greater than 5%. None of the meters had a mean deviation greater than 10%. The accuracy fluctuated between 0.85 and 0.94. The Kappa index was between 66 to 85. In our clinical trial, the Accu-Chek, Glucotouch, OneTouch, and Precision demonstrated greater accuracy and a higher Kappa index than the HemoCue.
Our data showed good concordance in statistical and clinical parameters for most of the six glucose meters. The HemoCue, recommended as a standard method in several countries, did not show better concordance than most of the tested glucose meters. When used by well-trained personnel, the accuracy of the Accu-Chek, Glucotouch, One-Touch, and Precision was acceptable for use in gestational diabetes screening.
尽管血糖仪是用于自我监测血糖水平的成熟仪器,但诊断和筛查程序应使用标准实验室方法进行。除标准实验室方法外,德国已批准HemoCue用于筛查和诊断目的。其他血糖仪的快速发展使得有必要重新评估这一建议。我们的目的是测试血糖仪在筛查妊娠患者妊娠糖尿病方面的实用性。
对193名孕妇进行50克葡萄糖耐量试验,然后用五台便携式血糖仪和HemoCue同时测量她们的血糖水平。将结果与我们的标准方法(己糖激酶法)进行比较。采用7.8 mmol/L的截断值,并计算敏感性、特异性、准确性、约登指数和kappa指数。测试由训练有素的人员(C.D.和U.S.)进行。
对193名患者进行了1212次测量。所有血糖仪均显示出非常好的相关性(r>0.90)。没有测量值显示出需要进行误差网格分析的极端偏差。GlucoTouch(5.93%±7.4)和HemoCue(-9.04%±5.9)的平均偏差大于5%。没有一台血糖仪的平均偏差大于10%。准确性在0.85至0.94之间波动。kappa指数在66至85之间。在我们的临床试验中,拜安易、GlucoTouch、稳豪和Precision血糖仪比HemoCue表现出更高的准确性和kappa指数。
我们的数据显示,六种血糖仪中的大多数在统计和临床参数方面具有良好的一致性。在几个国家被推荐为标准方法的HemoCue,其一致性并不比大多数测试的血糖仪更好。当由训练有素的人员使用时,拜安易、GlucoTouch、稳豪和Precision血糖仪在妊娠糖尿病筛查中的准确性是可以接受的。