Malkawi H Y, Qublan H S, Hamaideh A H
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Medical Services, Amman, Jordan.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003 May;23(3):289-93. doi: 10.1080/01443610310000100123.
This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of metformin compared with ovarian drilling in the treatment of clomiphene citrate (CC) resistant women with polycystic ovary syndrome. A total of 161 infertile, CC-resistant women with PCOS aged 22-34 years (mean 25.5 +/- 4.4) were evaluated prospectively during the period between January 2000 and December 2001. Patients were allocated into two groups; group 1 includes 64 women who received metformin, 850 mg twice daily throughout the cycle, and group 2 which includes 97 women who underwent laparoscopic ovarian drilling. If spontaneous ovulation or pregnancy was not achieved within 3 months after treatment, CC was added with increments of 50 mg (up to 150 mg/day) for both groups. Clinical and menstrual characteristics in addition to the hormonal profile were evaluated before and after the treatment. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, body weight, BMI, duration of infertility and serum hormone levels (androgens, gonadotrophins, insulin) before starting the treatment. A significant improvement in the regularity of menstrual cycles (P < 0.05) and a significant reduction in the serum levels of testosterone(P<0.01), androstenedione (P<0.01), DHEAS (P <0.05), LH (P<0.01) and LH:FSH ratio (P<0.05) were noted after the treatment. There were no significant differences between the metformin group compared with the drilling group in the rates of ovulation (79.7% vs. 83.5%) and pregnancy (64.1% vs. 59.8%). It is concluded that CC-resistant patients with polycystic ovary syndrome can be treated effectively either by metformin or by laparoscopic ovarian drilling. Menstrual cycle pattern and the rates of ovulation and pregnancy are improved significantly, due most probably to the significant decrease in the levels of androgens and luteinising hormone.
本研究旨在评估二甲双胍与卵巢打孔术相比,在治疗克罗米芬(CC)抵抗的多囊卵巢综合征女性中的疗效。在2000年1月至2001年12月期间,对161例年龄在22 - 34岁(平均25.5 +/- 4.4岁)、不孕且对CC抵抗的多囊卵巢综合征女性进行了前瞻性评估。患者被分为两组;第1组包括64名女性,她们在整个周期中每天两次服用850毫克二甲双胍,第2组包括97名接受腹腔镜卵巢打孔术的女性。如果在治疗后3个月内未实现自发排卵或妊娠,则两组均添加CC,每次增加50毫克(最高至150毫克/天)。在治疗前后评估了临床和月经特征以及激素水平。在开始治疗前,两组在年龄、体重、BMI、不孕持续时间和血清激素水平(雄激素、促性腺激素、胰岛素)方面无显著差异。治疗后,月经周期规律性有显著改善(P < 0.05),血清睾酮水平(P<0.01)、雄烯二酮(P<0.01)、硫酸脱氢表雄酮(P <0.05)、促黄体生成素(LH,P<0.01)和LH:FSH比值(P<0.05)显著降低。二甲双胍组与打孔组在排卵率(79.7%对83.5%)和妊娠率(64.1%对59.8%)方面无显著差异。结论是,多囊卵巢综合征的CC抵抗患者可通过二甲双胍或腹腔镜卵巢打孔术有效治疗。月经周期模式以及排卵率和妊娠率显著改善,这很可能是由于雄激素和促黄体生成素水平显著降低所致。