Tice Jeffrey A, Ettinger Bruce, Ensrud Kris, Wallace Robert, Blackwell Terri, Cummings Steven R
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143, USA.
JAMA. 2003 Jul 9;290(2):207-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.2.207.
Clinical trials demonstrating increased risk of cardiovascular disease and breast cancer among women randomized to hormone replacement therapy have increased interest in other therapies for menopausal symptoms. Dietary supplements containing isoflavones are widely used as alternatives to hormonal therapies for hot flashes, but there is a paucity of data supporting their efficacy.
To compare the efficacy and safety of 2 dietary supplements derived from red clover with placebo in symptomatic menopausal women.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of menopausal women, aged 45 to 60 years, who were experiencing at least 35 hot flashes per week. The study was conducted between November 1999 and March 2001 at 3 US medical centers and included women who were recently postmenopausal (mean [SD], 3.3 [4.5] years since menopause) experiencing 8.1 hot flashes per day. Women were excluded if they were vegetarians, consumed soy products more than once per week, or took medications affecting isoflavone absorption.
After a 2-week placebo run-in, 252 participants were randomly assigned to Promensil (82 mg of total isoflavones per day), Rimostil (57 mg of total isoflavones per day), or an identical placebo, and followed-up for 12 weeks.
The primary outcome measure was the change in frequency of hot flashes measured by participant daily diaries. Secondary outcome measures included changes in quality of life and adverse events.
Of 252 participants, 246 (98%) completed the 12-week protocol. The reductions in mean daily hot flash count at 12 weeks were similar for the Promensil (5.1), Rimostil (5.4), and placebo (5.0) groups. In comparison with the placebo group, participants in the Promensil group (41%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 29%-51%; P =.03), but not in the Rimostil group (34%; 95% CI, 22%-46%; P =.74) reduced hot flashes more rapidly. Quality-of-life improvements and adverse events were comparable in the 3 groups.
Although the study provides some evidence for a biological effect of Promensil, neither supplement had a clinically important effect on hot flashes or other symptoms of menopause.
临床试验表明,随机接受激素替代疗法的女性患心血管疾病和乳腺癌的风险增加,这使得人们对治疗更年期症状的其他疗法兴趣大增。含有异黄酮的膳食补充剂被广泛用作潮热激素疗法的替代品,但支持其疗效的数据很少。
比较两种红三叶草来源的膳食补充剂与安慰剂对有症状的更年期女性的疗效和安全性。
设计、地点和参与者:对年龄在45至60岁、每周至少经历35次潮热的更年期女性进行随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。该研究于1999年11月至2001年3月在美国的3个医疗中心进行,纳入了近期绝经(绝经后平均[标准差]为3.3[4.5]年)、每天经历8.1次潮热的女性。如果女性是素食者、每周食用豆制品超过一次或服用影响异黄酮吸收的药物,则被排除在外。
在进行为期2周的安慰剂导入期后,252名参与者被随机分配到普洛美新(每天82毫克总异黄酮)、瑞莫斯蒂(每天57毫克总异黄酮)或相同的安慰剂组,并随访12周。
主要结局指标是通过参与者每日日记测量的潮热频率变化。次要结局指标包括生活质量变化和不良事件。
252名参与者中,246名(98%)完成了12周的方案。普洛美新组(5.1次)、瑞莫斯蒂组(5.4次)和安慰剂组(5.0次)在12周时平均每日潮热次数的减少相似。与安慰剂组相比,普洛美新组的参与者(41%;95%置信区间[CI],29%-51%;P=.03)潮热次数减少更快,但瑞莫斯蒂组(34%;95%CI,22%-46%;P=.74)并非如此。三组的生活质量改善情况和不良事件相当。
尽管该研究为普洛美新的生物学效应提供了一些证据,但两种补充剂对潮热或其他更年期症状均无临床重要影响。