• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

责任与眼科药物使用。

Liability and ophthalmic drug use.

作者信息

Classé J G

出版信息

Optom Clin. 1992;2(4):121-34.

PMID:1286237
Abstract

Ophthalmic drug use has been an aspect of optometry for more than two decades. Although utilization of these drugs has produced significant changes in the clinical and legal responsibilities of optometrists, the liability posture of the profession has remained unaltered. Studies of malpractice claims against optometrists and ophthalmologists have demonstrated that ophthalmologists are much more likely to be charged with negligence for adverse drug reactions and that drug-related malpractice claims are not a liability issue for optometrists. Based on the experiences of both professions, this paper describes the adverse effects of common ophthalmic drugs, with emphasis on those drug reactions that have resulted in litigation.

摘要

二十多年来,眼科用药一直是验光配镜行业的一个方面。尽管这些药物的使用给验光师的临床和法律责任带来了重大变化,但该行业的责任状况仍未改变。针对验光师和眼科医生的医疗事故索赔研究表明,眼科医生因药物不良反应而被指控疏忽大意的可能性要大得多,而与药物相关的医疗事故索赔对验光师来说并不是一个责任问题。基于这两个行业的经验,本文描述了常见眼科药物的不良反应,重点是那些导致诉讼的药物反应。

相似文献

1
Liability and ophthalmic drug use.责任与眼科药物使用。
Optom Clin. 1992;2(4):121-34.
2
Liability for pediatric care.儿科护理责任
Optom Clin. 1996;5(2):161-85.
3
Standards of care when diagnosing or treating the glaucomas.
Optom Clin. 1991;1(1):193-204.
4
Liability for the treatment of anterior segment eye disease.
Optom Clin. 1991;1(4):1-16.
5
Glaucoma--a clinicolegal review.
J Am Optom Assoc. 1997 Jun;68(6):389-94.
6
Five liability claims involving the cornea and how they could have been prevented.
Optom Clin. 1995;4(3):75-85.
7
A review of 50 malpractice claims.
J Am Optom Assoc. 1989 Sep;60(9):694-706.
8
A survey of Missouri doctors of optometry who have not been certified to use therapeutic pharmaceutical agents.一项针对密苏里州未获得使用治疗性药物认证的验光师的调查。
J Am Optom Assoc. 1990 Sep;61(9):685-8.
9
Professional liability and the Federal Tort Claims Act.
J Am Optom Assoc. 1990 Jan;61(1):57-61.
10
Avoiding liability in contact lens practice.
Optom Clin. 1994;4(1):1-12.