• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[医疗保险与医疗服务之间的能力共享]

[Competence sharing between health insurance and medical service].

作者信息

Hennies G

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 1992 Nov;54(11):635-9.

PMID:1286243
Abstract

The borderlines between the areas of competence of the German compulsory health insurance authorities and their Medical Service can be drawn as follows: 1. The German compulsory health insurance body is legally obliged to clarify the facts concerning a patient and his illness. It is therefore imperative for the health insurance body to prepare the ground in each individual case in such a manner that the case in question can be entrusted to a doctor called upon to write an expertise, but the final decision in respect of the insurance coverage rests exclusively with the health insurance body. 2. The Medical Service system is component for helping to find the fact that must be known before the administrative procedure to arrive at a decision is initiated. The expertise given by the Medical Service is a decision help invaluably important on the grounds of specialist knowledge, knowledge of facts and experience gathered from medical practice. Wherever the borderlines of such competencies are overstepped, there is a risk of errors occurring in the expertise and in the administrative decisions based thereon. Such sources of error can be eliminated only if both parties know and accept their limitations and also do not expect the other side to cross these boundaries.

摘要

德国法定医疗保险机构与其医疗服务机构的职权范围边界划分如下

  1. 德国法定医疗保险机构在法律上有义务澄清有关患者及其疾病的事实。因此,医疗保险机构必须在每一个案中做好准备工作,以便能够将相关案件委托给被要求出具鉴定书的医生,但有关保险范围的最终决定权完全在于医疗保险机构。2. 医疗服务体系是一个有助于查明在启动行政程序以做出决定之前必须了解的事实的组成部分。医疗服务机构出具的鉴定书基于专业知识、事实了解以及从医疗实践中积累的经验,是非常重要的决策辅助依据。只要这种职权范围的边界被跨越,就存在鉴定书以及基于此做出的行政决定出现错误的风险。只有当双方都了解并接受各自的局限性,且不期望对方跨越这些界限时,此类错误来源才能消除。

相似文献

1
[Competence sharing between health insurance and medical service].[医疗保险与医疗服务之间的能力共享]
Gesundheitswesen. 1992 Nov;54(11):635-9.
2
[Psychology in the context of medical expert assessment].[医学专家评估背景下的心理学]
Gesundheitswesen. 1992 Nov;54(11):640-4.
3
[Expert assessment and counseling--a contradiction?].[专家评估与咨询——相互矛盾?]
Gesundheitswesen. 1994 Feb;56(2):103-6.
4
[Organization of social medicine counseling according to section 275 Abs. 4 SGB V exemplified by the Mecklenburg-Vorpommern medical service].[以梅克伦堡-前波美拉尼亚医疗服务为例,根据《社会法典》第五编第275条第4款进行的社会医学咨询组织]
Gesundheitswesen. 1992 Sep;54(9):465-9.
5
[Determination or expert assessment of eligibility for intensive nursing care?--Comments on a decision by the Federal Social Court (4RK 1/92, passed down 30 September 1993)].
Gesundheitswesen. 1994 Jun;56(6):305-8.
6
[Perspectives in social medicine counseling and expert assessment exemplified by the medical service of health insurance].
Gesundheitswesen. 1996 Oct;58 Suppl 3:188-93.
7
[Severe disability. Part 2: The difficult comparison with same age probands].[严重残疾。第2部分:与同龄先证者的艰难比较]
Fortschr Med. 1992 Jul 20;110(20):374-6.
8
[Categorizing work disabled patients by the medical service of health insurance].[根据医疗保险的医疗服务对丧失工作能力的患者进行分类]
Gesundheitswesen. 1995 Mar;57(3):151-2.
9
[Expert assessment of work disability--do we realize the effects?].
Gesundheitswesen. 1997 Aug-Sep;59(8-9):483-7.
10
[Section 51 SGBV--possibilities from the social medicine viewpoint].[《社会法典》第五十一编——基于社会医学视角的可能性]
Gesundheitswesen. 1994 Jun;56(6):309-12.