Abenhaim L, Bergeron A M
Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Community Studies, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec.
Clin Invest Med. 1992 Dec;15(6):527-35.
Manipulative therapy has been one of the most intensively studied approaches to back pain management. This paper reviews 20 years of randomized clinical trials of manipulative therapy, and addresses the following issues: for what condition were these patients treated? What was the population studied, and were workers included? Was a specific technique, spinal manipulation, or a more global approach the object of the trial? Finally, were there long-term outcome measures? The 21 randomized clinical trials reviewed here provide some indication that manipulative therapy offers some positive short-term results; it is not clear at this point whether long-term effects of the treatment have been adequately evaluated. Lack of specificity in the description of samples makes it impossible to conclude on the benefit of spinal manipulation for workers. Whether manipulation is solely responsible for the changes mentioned in these studies, independently of the global approach put forth by its practitioners, is also an open question that awaits further study.
手法治疗一直是对背痛管理研究最为深入的方法之一。本文回顾了20年的手法治疗随机临床试验,并探讨了以下问题:这些患者接受治疗的病症是什么?所研究的人群是哪些,其中包括工人吗?试验的对象是特定技术、脊柱推拿,还是更全面的方法?最后,是否有长期的结果测量指标?本文回顾的21项随机临床试验提供了一些迹象,表明手法治疗能带来一些积极的短期效果;目前尚不清楚该治疗的长期效果是否得到了充分评估。样本描述缺乏特异性,使得无法得出脊柱推拿对工人有益的结论。手法治疗是否单独导致了这些研究中提到的变化,而不依赖于从业者所采用的全面方法,这也是一个有待进一步研究的开放性问题。