Suppr超能文献

采用氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描检测卵巢癌的腹膜和腹膜后转移灶

Positron emission tomography with FDG in the detection of peritoneal and retroperitoneal metastases of ovarian cancer.

作者信息

Drieskens O, Stroobants S, Gysen M, Vandenbosch G, Mortelmans L, Vergote I

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2003;55(3):130-4. doi: 10.1159/000071525.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate (18)F-FDG-PET, in comparison with CT, for the detection of peritoneal and retroperitoneal metastases of ovarian cancer.

METHODOLOGY

13 patients with primary (n = 7) or recurrent (n = 6) ovarian cancer underwent an attenuation-corrected (18)F-FDG-PET of the abdomen as well as a contrast-enhanced abdominal CT, followed by surgical staging. For data analysis, the abdomen was artificially divided into six regions (right and left subphrenic region, right and left paracolic gutter, retroperitoneum and central abdomen). All images were reviewed and each region was visually scored on (18)F-FDG-PET as well as on CT. (18)F-FDG-PET results were compared with those of CT, using the surgical data as gold standard.

RESULTS

73 regions were evaluable surgically and or histologically. Sensitivity was slightly better for CT than for (18)F-FDG-PET (74 vs. 66%). Metastases of <5 mm were missed with both techniques. Specificity, however, was clearly better for (18)F-FDG-PET than for CT (94 vs. 77%), especially in patients with recurrent disease, where postoperative changes (hematomas, adhesions, etc.) caused more false positive results on CT. Retroperitoneal lymph node involvement was found in 3/13 patients. The result of (18)F-FDG-PET for the retroperitoneal lymph nodes was correct in all cases, whereas CT was false positive in 2 patients. (18)F-FDG-PET is relatively inaccurate for the right and the left subphrenic region (missing tumor involvement in 5 patients compared to 2 patients for CT).

CONCLUSION

Given the low sensitivity of both (18)F-FDG-PET and CT for the detection of peritoneal metastases, surgical staging remains the gold standard. Because of the better specificity, (18)F-FDG-PET might be preferred for evaluating residual or recurrent disease after surgery. (18)F-FDG-PET was more sensitive in the retroperitoneal region than intraperitoneal.

摘要

目的

本前瞻性研究旨在评估¹⁸F-FDG-PET相较于CT在检测卵巢癌腹膜及腹膜后转移方面的效果。

方法

13例原发性(n = 7)或复发性(n = 6)卵巢癌患者接受了腹部¹⁸F-FDG-PET衰减校正检查以及增强腹部CT检查,随后进行手术分期。为进行数据分析,将腹部人为划分为六个区域(左右膈下区域、左右结肠旁沟、腹膜后及中腹部)。对所有图像进行了评估,并在¹⁸F-FDG-PET及CT上对每个区域进行了视觉评分。以手术数据作为金标准,将¹⁸F-FDG-PET结果与CT结果进行比较。

结果

73个区域可通过手术或组织学进行评估。CT的敏感性略高于¹⁸F-FDG-PET(74%对66%)。两种技术均漏诊了小于5mm的转移灶。然而,¹⁸F-FDG-PET的特异性明显优于CT(94%对77%),尤其是在复发性疾病患者中,术后改变(血肿、粘连等)在CT上导致了更多假阳性结果。13例患者中有3例发现腹膜后淋巴结受累。¹⁸F-FDG-PET对腹膜后淋巴结的检查结果在所有病例中均正确,而CT在2例患者中出现假阳性。¹⁸F-FDG-PET对左右膈下区域的检查相对不准确(与CT漏诊2例患者相比,¹⁸F-FDG-PET漏诊了5例患者的肿瘤受累情况)。

结论

鉴于¹⁸F-FDG-PET和CT检测腹膜转移的敏感性均较低,手术分期仍是金标准。由于¹⁸F-FDG-PET具有更好的特异性,在评估术后残留或复发性疾病时可能更受青睐。¹⁸F-FDG-PET在腹膜后区域比在腹腔内更敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验