Peavey Christina L, Edwards Ryland B, Escarcega Anthony J, Vanderby Ray, Markel Mark D
Comparative Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Madison, WI, USA.
Vet Surg. 2003 Jul-Aug;32(4):350-8. doi: 10.1053/jvet.2003.50048.
To determine the optimal fixation technique for equine interdental space fractures by evaluating the biomechanical characteristics of 4 fixation techniques.
In vitro randomized block design.
Twenty-seven adult equine mandibles.
Mandibles with interdental osteotomies were randomly divided into 4 fixation groups (n = 6/group). Fixation techniques were the following: (1) dynamic compression plates (DCP), (2) external fixator (EF), (3) external fixator with interdental wires (EFW), and (4) intraoral splint with interdental wires (ISW). Three intact (nonosteotomized) mandibles were tested as controls. Mandibles were subjected to monotonic cantilever bending until failure. Angular displacement data (radians) were derived from continuously recorded gap width measurements provided by extensometers placed across the osteotomy site. Osteotomy gap width data (mm) at 50 and 100 Nm were selected for standardized comparison of gap width before the yield point and failure point, respectively of all constructs tested. Stiffness (Nm/radian), yield strength (Nm), and failure strength (Nm) were determined from bending moment-angular displacement curves and were compared using ANOVA with appropriate post hoc testing when indicated. Radiographs were obtained prefixation, postfixation, and posttesting.
Bending stiffness, yield, and ultimate failure loads were greatest for intact mandibles. Among osteotomized mandibles, stiffness was greatest for DCP constructs (P <.05) and was not significantly different among EF, EFW, and ISW constructs. Yield load was greatest for ISW constructs (P <.05) and was not significantly different among DCP and EFW constructs. Yield and ultimate failure loads were lowest (P <.05) and osteotomy gap width at 50 and 100 Nm were greatest for EF constructs (P =.09 and P <.05, respectively). There was no significant difference in failure loads and osteotomy gap widths among DCP, EFW, and ISW constructs (P <.05). Failure occurred through the screw-bone interface (DCP), acrylic splint (ISW), acrylic connecting bar and/or pin-bone interface (EF, EFW), and wire loosening (EFW). All 3 intact mandibles fractured through the vertical ramus at its attachment to the testing apparatus.
Among osteotomized mandibles, DCP fixation had the greatest stiffness under monotonic bending to failure; however, the relatively low yield value may predispose it to earlier failure in fatigue testing without supplemental fixation. Techniques using tension-band wiring (EFW and ISW) were similar to DCP constructs in yield, failure, and osteotomy displacement, whereas EF constructs were biomechanically inferior to all other constructs.
DCP fixation is most likely the most stable form of fixation for comminuted interdental space fractures. However, for simple interdental space fractures, ISW fixation may provide adequate stability with minimal invasiveness and decreased expense. Tension-band wiring significantly enhances the strength of type II external skeletal fixators and should be used to augment mandibular fracture repairs.
通过评估4种固定技术的生物力学特性,确定马齿间隙骨折的最佳固定技术。
体外随机区组设计。
27个成年马下颌骨。
有齿间截骨术的下颌骨随机分为4个固定组(每组n = 6)。固定技术如下:(1)动力加压钢板(DCP),(2)外固定架(EF),(3)带齿间钢丝的外固定架(EFW),以及(4)带齿间钢丝的口内夹板(ISW)。测试3个完整(未截骨)的下颌骨作为对照。对下颌骨进行单调悬臂弯曲直至失效。角位移数据(弧度)来自通过放置在截骨部位的引伸计连续记录的间隙宽度测量值。分别选择50和100 Nm时的截骨间隙宽度数据(mm),用于对所有测试结构在屈服点和失效点之前的间隙宽度进行标准化比较。根据弯矩 - 角位移曲线确定刚度(Nm/弧度)、屈服强度(Nm)和失效强度(Nm),并在有指示时使用方差分析及适当的事后检验进行比较。在固定前、固定后和测试后获得X线片。
完整下颌骨的弯曲刚度、屈服和极限失效载荷最大。在截骨的下颌骨中,DCP结构的刚度最大(P <.05),而EF、EFW和ISW结构之间无显著差异。ISW结构的屈服载荷最大(P <.05),DCP和EFW结构之间无显著差异。EF结构的屈服和极限失效载荷最低(P <.05),50和100 Nm时的截骨间隙宽度最大(分别为P =.09和P <.05)。DCP、EFW和ISW结构之间在失效载荷和截骨间隙宽度方面无显著差异(P <.05)。失效发生在螺钉 - 骨界面(DCP)、丙烯酸夹板(ISW)、丙烯酸连接杆和/或针 - 骨界面(EF和EFW)以及钢丝松动(EFW)处。所有3个完整下颌骨均在其与测试装置连接处的垂直支处骨折。
在截骨的下颌骨中,DCP固定在单调弯曲至失效时具有最大刚度;然而,相对较低的屈服值可能使其在无补充固定的疲劳测试中更早失效。使用张力带钢丝的技术(EFW和ISW)在屈服、失效和截骨位移方面与DCP结构相似,而EF结构在生物力学上劣于所有其他结构。
DCP固定很可能是粉碎性齿间隙骨折最稳定的固定形式。然而,对于简单的齿间隙骨折,ISW固定可能以最小的侵入性和降低的费用提供足够的稳定性。张力带钢丝显著增强了II型外骨骼固定器的强度,应用于增强下颌骨骨折修复。