Kern D A, Smith M M, Stevenson S, Moon M L, Saunders G K, Irby M H, Dyer K R
Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061, USA.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1995 Jun 15;206(12):1883-90.
Bilateral midbody hemimandibular osteotomies were performed between premolars 3 and 4 in 18 adult dogs. Hemimandibles were repaired by use of monocortically applied bone plates (n = 6), an interdental fixator composed of an Erich arch bar and acrylic (n = 6), or a type I external skeletal fixator (n = 6). At the immediate postoperative evaluation, hemimandibles stabilized with interdental fixators had an osteotomy gap distance (mean +/- SEM, 1.6 +/- 0.2 mm) that was significantly (P < 0.05) greater than for hemimandibles stabilized with external skeletal fixators (1.2 +/- 0.3 mm). Osteotomy gap distance of hemimandibles stabilized with external skeletal fixators (1.5 +/- 0.2 mm) was significantly (P < 0.05) greater at weeks 4 (1.1 +/- 0.2 mm) and 8 (0.8 +/- 0.3 mm) after surgery than the osteotomy gap distance of hemimandibles stabilized by application of bone plates. By week 16, significant differences in osteotomy gap distance were not detected between groups. Immediately after surgery, mandibular alignment measurements were not significantly different for dogs with bone plates (0.3 +/- 0.1 mm), interdental fixators (0.3 +/- 0.1 mm), and external skeletal fixators (0.9 +/- 0.5 mm). Mandibular alignment scores were not significantly different between treatment groups during the remaining postoperative period. Occlusal measurements were not significantly different between evaluations performed before surgery and 16 weeks after surgery, regardless of treatment group. Radiographic evidence of healing in hemimandibles stabilized with external skeletal fixators was significantly (P < 0.05) less at 4 and 8 weeks, compared with hemimandibles stabilized with bone plates and interdental fixators; however, radiographic evidence of bone healing was not significantly different between fixation groups at 16 weeks.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在18只成年犬的第3和第4前磨牙之间进行双侧半体下颌骨截骨术。半侧下颌骨通过单皮质应用骨板(n = 6)、由 Erich 弓杆和丙烯酸组成的牙间固定器(n = 6)或 I 型外骨骼固定器(n = 6)进行修复。在术后即刻评估时,使用牙间固定器稳定的半侧下颌骨的截骨间隙距离(平均值±标准误,1.6±0.2 mm)显著(P < 0.05)大于使用外骨骼固定器稳定的半侧下颌骨(1.2±0.3 mm)。使用外骨骼固定器稳定的半侧下颌骨在术后第4周(1.1±0.2 mm)和第8周(0.8±0.3 mm)的截骨间隙距离显著(P < 0.05)大于通过应用骨板稳定的半侧下颌骨。到第16周时,各组之间未检测到截骨间隙距离的显著差异。术后即刻,使用骨板(0.3±0.1 mm)、牙间固定器(0.3±0.1 mm)和外骨骼固定器(0.9±0.5 mm)的犬下颌对齐测量值无显著差异。在术后剩余期间,各治疗组之间的下颌对齐评分无显著差异。无论治疗组如何,术前和术后16周进行的咬合测量无显著差异。与使用骨板和牙间固定器稳定的半侧下颌骨相比,使用外骨骼固定器稳定的半侧下颌骨在第4周和第8周时愈合的影像学证据显著(P < 0.05)较少;然而,在第16周时,固定组之间骨愈合的影像学证据无显著差异。(摘要截断于250字)