Steunenberg B, Beekman A T, Deeg D J, Kerkhof A J
Afdeling Klinische Psychologie, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam.
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2003 Jun;34(3):118-24.
This article reports on the relation between aging and personal adjustment. Current personality scales are not developed for older persons. Scales contain items which are not valid for an aging population and contain too many items for administration in older populations. As part of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) Neuroticism in older persons was measured with a shortened version of the Inadequacy (IN) and Social Inadequacy (SI) scales of the Dutch Personality Questionnaire (DPQ). The utility of these shortened scales was assessed based on internal consistency, inter-item correlations, test-retest reliability and factor analysis. The consistency of the personality dimension Neuroticism was assessed based on cohort-differences and a 6-year longitudinal comparison. The research-population contained 2118 respondents at baseline, aged between 55 and 85 years, 49% were male and they were not living in an institution. The shortened scales appeared to be reliable and valid instruments to measure Neuroticism in the elderly. The gaining of time due to the administration of the shortened scales enlarges the feasibility of the scales for measuring Neuroticism in older persons. Results showed no significant age-difference on the IN-scale, but revealed a significant difference on the SI-scale (p < .01). The 65+ elderly (65-74 and 75-85) have higher scores on Social Inadequacy than the youngest elderly (55-64). Longitudinal analyses showed an interaction between age at baseline and the stability and change of the level of Neuroticism. On both scales the youngest age-group showed a significant decline in mean level of Neuroticism (p < .01). The mean level of Social Inadequacy in the oldest age-group showed an increase during the 6-year follow-up period (p < .05). However, the differences were very small. Future research is needed to assess the effect of related variables on Neuroticism in older persons.
本文报道了衰老与个人适应之间的关系。当前的人格量表并非针对老年人编制。这些量表包含一些对老年人群无效的项目,并且项目过多,不适合在老年人群中施测。作为阿姆斯特丹纵向衰老研究(LASA)的一部分,使用荷兰人格问卷(DPQ)中不足(IN)量表和社交不足(SI)量表的简化版对老年人的神经质进行了测量。基于内部一致性、项目间相关性、重测信度和因子分析对这些简化量表的效用进行了评估。基于队列差异和6年的纵向比较对人格维度神经质的一致性进行了评估。研究人群在基线时有2118名受访者,年龄在55岁至85岁之间,49%为男性,且不住在机构中。简化量表似乎是测量老年人神经质的可靠且有效的工具。由于使用简化量表而节省的时间增加了该量表用于测量老年人神经质的可行性。结果显示,在IN量表上没有显著的年龄差异,但在SI量表上有显著差异(p < .01)。65岁及以上的老年人(65 - 74岁和75 - 85岁)在社交不足方面的得分高于最年轻的老年人(55 - 64岁)。纵向分析显示基线年龄与神经质水平的稳定性和变化之间存在交互作用。在两个量表上,最年轻的年龄组神经质平均水平均显著下降(p < .01)。在6年的随访期内,最年长年龄组的社交不足平均水平有所增加(p < .05)。然而,差异非常小。需要进一步的研究来评估相关变量对老年人神经质的影响。