Weiss Alexander, Costa Paul T
Laboratory of Personality and Cognition, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, 5600 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224-6825, USA.
Psychosom Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;67(5):724-33. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000181272.58103.18.
Our objectives were to test whether Conscientiousness, the other 4 domains of the Five-Factor Model, and their facets predicted mortality in older, frail individuals.
Controlling for demographic and health measures, we used Cox regression to test whether the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness domains predicted all-cause mortality over 5 years in 1076 65- to 100-year-old participants who took part in a Medicare Demonstration study. Supplementary analyses on 597 participants aged 66 to 102 who were reassessed 2 years later were conducted to determine whether any of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) facets were related to mortality.
When personality domains were treated as continuous variables, NEO-FFI Neuroticism and Agreeableness were significant protective factors. When personality domains were trichotomized, NEO-FFI Conscientiousness was a protective factor. In a third analysis, Agreeableness was not a significant predictor in a model that included the continuous Neuroticism and trichotomized Conscientiousness variables. Analysis of the NEO-PI-R Neuroticism, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness factors showed that Agreeableness and Conscientiousness were protective and that there was a trend for a similar effect of Neuroticism. Facet-level analyses revealed that the Impulsiveness, Straightforwardness, and Self-Discipline facets of Neuroticism, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness, respectively, were prospectively related to greater survival over a 3-year interval.
The effects of Neuroticism and Agreeableness on mortality are inconsistent across previous studies. This study indicates that, in a sample of older, frail participants, high Neuroticism and Agreeableness scores are protective and that more specific effects are primarily the result of the Impulsiveness and Straightforwardness facet scales. The Conscientiousness findings are consistent with those in earlier studies and demonstrate the importance of the Self-Discipline facet.
我们的目的是测试尽责性、五因素模型的其他四个领域及其方面是否能预测老年体弱个体的死亡率。
在控制人口统计学和健康指标的情况下,我们使用Cox回归来测试NEO五因素问卷(NEO-FFI)中的神经质、外向性、经验开放性、宜人性和尽责性领域是否能预测1076名年龄在65至100岁之间参与医疗保险示范研究的参与者在5年内的全因死亡率。对597名年龄在66至102岁之间且在2年后接受重新评估的参与者进行了补充分析,以确定修订后的NEO人格问卷(NEO-PI-R)的任何方面是否与死亡率相关。
当将人格领域视为连续变量时,NEO-FFI中的神经质和宜人性是显著的保护因素。当将人格领域分为三类时,NEO-FFI中的尽责性是一个保护因素。在第三次分析中,在包含连续神经质和三分法尽责性变量的模型中,宜人性不是一个显著的预测因素。对NEO-PI-R中的神经质、宜人性和尽责性因素的分析表明,宜人性和尽责性具有保护作用,并且神经质有类似作用的趋势。方面层面的分析显示,神经质、宜人性和尽责性的冲动性、直率性和自律性方面分别与3年期间更高的生存率呈前瞻性相关。
以往研究中,神经质和宜人性对死亡率的影响并不一致。本研究表明,在老年体弱参与者样本中,高神经质和宜人性得分具有保护作用,更具体的影响主要是冲动性和直率性方面量表的结果。尽责性的研究结果与早期研究一致,并证明了自律性方面的重要性。