Cardaropoli Giuseppe, Wennström Jan L, Lekholm Ulf
Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Aug;14(4):430-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00895.x.
The aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate longitudinal alterations in radiographic bone topography at proximal sites of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial prostheses during the first 3 years after bridge installation, in relation to vertical and horizontal inter-unit distances. The subjects were partially dentate patients who had received implant-supported fixed partial prostheses during the year 1995 at the Brånemark Clinic, Göteborg, Sweden. For inclusion in the study, the patient had to have a three-unit bridge construction supported by three implants in the posterior area of the jaw. Twenty-eight patients having 35 screw-retained prostheses on Brånemark standard implants fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Radiographs obtained at bridge installation and at 1- and 3-year follow-ups were assessed for implant positions, contact point level, bone level at implants and adjacent tooth and mid-proximal bone crest level. The data were analysed with respect to two proximal units: tooth/implant units (n=35) and implant/implant units (n=70). Multiple regression analyses were used to evaluate the influence of various factors on the peri-implant and periodontal bone level changes during the 3 years of follow-up. At the tooth/implant units, the mean bone loss over the 3 years was 0.5 mm at the implant and 0.4 mm at the tooth. Multiple regression analysis failed to identify significant explanatory factors for the peri-implant/periodontal bone level changes at the tooth/implant units (R2=0.28). At the implant/implant units, the peri-implant bone loss was 0.6-0.7 mm and was significantly influenced by the vertical inter-implant distance (P<0.01), the difference in bone level at baseline between two neighbouring implants (P<0.001) and the bone level changes at the opposed implant surface (P<0.001) (R2=0.49). Furthermore, the magnitude of apical displacement of the inter-implant bone crest level during the 3 years of follow-up was negatively associated with the horizontal inter-implant distance (P<0.05). The results of the study demonstrated that both vertical and horizontal differences in implant positions might influence bone alterations in the inter-implant area during the first 3 years of loading, while the data failed to show corresponding relationships for the bone changes at the proximal area between the implant and the neighbouring tooth.
本回顾性研究的目的是评估在种植体支持的三单位固定局部义齿桥安装后的前3年,其近端部位的放射学骨形态的纵向变化,以及垂直和水平单位间距离的关系。研究对象为部分牙列缺损患者,他们于1995年在瑞典哥德堡的Brånemark诊所接受了种植体支持的固定局部义齿修复。为纳入本研究,患者必须在下颌后部区域有一个由三颗种植体支持的三单位桥结构。28例患者在Brånemark标准种植体上安装了35颗螺丝固位义齿,符合纳入标准。对义齿安装时、1年和3年随访时获得的X线片进行评估,观察种植体位置、接触点水平、种植体及相邻牙齿处的骨水平以及近中骨嵴顶水平。针对两个近端单位分析数据:牙齿/种植体单位(n = 35)和种植体/种植体单位(n = 70)。采用多元回归分析评估在3年随访期间各种因素对种植体周围和牙周骨水平变化的影响。在牙齿/种植体单位,3年期间种植体处的平均骨吸收为0.5mm,牙齿处为0.4mm。多元回归分析未能确定牙齿/种植体单位种植体周围/牙周骨水平变化的显著解释因素(R2 = 0.28)。在种植体/种植体单位,种植体周围骨吸收为0.6 - 0.7mm,垂直种植体间距离(P < 0.01)、两个相邻种植体基线时的骨水平差异(P < 0.001)以及相对种植体表面的骨水平变化(P < 0.001)对其有显著影响(R2 = 0.49)。此外,在3年随访期间种植体间骨嵴顶水平的根尖移位幅度与水平种植体间距离呈负相关(P < 0.05)。研究结果表明,种植体位置的垂直和水平差异在加载的前3年可能会影响种植体间区域的骨改变,而数据未能显示种植体与相邻牙齿近端区域骨变化的相应关系。