• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Bill and Monica: memory, emotion and normativity in Clinton's Grand Jury testimony.

作者信息

Locke Abigail, Edwards Derek

机构信息

School of Health and Community Studies, University of Derby, UK.

出版信息

Br J Soc Psychol. 2003 Jun;42(Pt 2):239-56. doi: 10.1348/014466603322127238.

DOI:10.1348/014466603322127238
PMID:12869247
Abstract

We examine links between factual recall, emotion and constructions of normativity in narrative accounts, using as an empirical case President Clinton's descriptions of his relationship with Monica Lewinsky. We analyse those accounts in the sequences of talk in which they occurred, under Grand Jury cross-examination. Clinton's accounts of Lewinsky were part of how he attended to issues alive in court concerning himself, including his possible exploitation and abuse of power in an asymmetrical relationship; his motives, sincerity, credibility and intentions; and, indirectly, his fitness for office as President. Analysis focuses on how Clinton's portrayal of Lewinsky accomplished a reflexive portrayal of himself, not as mendacious and exploitative, but as caring, responsible, sincere, rational and consistent, while reducing the scope and implications of their admitted sexual relationship. This study is linked to a broader discursive psychology of factual description, memory, mental and emotional states, and their relevance to the larger business of institutional settings.

摘要

相似文献

1
Bill and Monica: memory, emotion and normativity in Clinton's Grand Jury testimony.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2003 Jun;42(Pt 2):239-56. doi: 10.1348/014466603322127238.
2
"Typical Clinton: brazen it out".典型的克林顿作风:厚颜无耻地硬撑过去。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2000 Jul;29(4):423-31. doi: 10.1023/a:1005107312579.
3
Workplace romance in the public sector: sex differences in reactions to the Clinton-Lewinsky affair.公共部门中的职场恋情:对克林顿 - 莱温斯基事件反应的性别差异。
Psychol Rep. 2000 Dec;87(3 Pt 2):1043-9. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2000.87.3f.1043.
4
Practical methods for detecting mendacity: a case study.检测说谎的实用方法:一项案例研究。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2001;29(4):438-44.
5
Pastoral response to the Clinton-Lewinsky affair in conservative and liberal churches.保守派和自由派教会对克林顿-莱温斯基事件的牧灵回应。
Psychol Rep. 2003 Dec;93(3 Pt 2):1083-94. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2003.93.3f.1083.
6
ASHP testimony on the outpatient prescription drug provisions of President Clinton's Health Security Act.美国卫生系统药师协会就克林顿总统《健康保障法案》中门诊处方药条款所作的证词。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1994 May 1;51(9):1233-4.
7
Fallen heroes, lifted hearts: consolation in contemporary Presidential eulogia.陨落的英雄,振奋的心灵:当代总统悼词中的慰藉
Death Stud. 2004 Oct;28(8):703-31. doi: 10.1080/07481180490483373.
8
How physicians will benefit under Clinton's plan. A talk with Judith Feder, PhD. Interview by Amber Stenger.医生们将如何从克林顿的计划中受益。与朱迪思·费德博士的一次谈话。安伯·斯滕格采访。
Postgrad Med. 1994 Feb 15;95(3):49-50, 53-6.
9
Advocacy groups back Clinton's return-to-work proposal.倡导团体支持克林顿的重返工作岗位提议。
AIDS Policy Law. 1999 Feb 5;14(2):3.
10
Clinton's tooth-fairy financing.克林顿式的牙仙融资。
J Am Health Policy. 1993 Nov-Dec;3(6):14-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Shaming interrogatives: Admonishments, the social psychology of emotion, and discursive practices of behaviour modification in family mealtimes.羞辱性疑问:训诫、情绪的社会心理学以及家庭用餐时间行为矫正的话语实践。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Apr;59(2):347-364. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12346. Epub 2019 Nov 12.