Suppr超能文献

五种D-二聚体检测在排除深静脉血栓形成中的效用。

The usefulness of five D-dimer assays in the exclusion of deep venous thrombosis.

作者信息

Schutgens R E G, Haas F J L M, Gerritsen W B M, van der Horst F, Nieuwenhuis H K, Biesma D H

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Thromb Haemost. 2003 May;1(5):976-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00148.x.

Abstract

D-Dimer measurement is a promising tool in the exclusion of venous thrombosis. New d-dimer assays have been introduced, but need clinical validation. Our objective was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of four relatively new d-dimer assays and a classical ELISA in outpatients suspected for deep venous thrombosis. In 537 patients, participants in a large prospective management study using a clinical probability score and a d-dimer measurement (Tina-quant), additional samples were taken for d-dimer measurement using the Asserachrom ELISA, the VIDAS New, the STA-LIA and the Miniquant assay. Performances of each test were calculated using clinical data during a 3-month follow-up. Thrombosis was detected in 224 patients (42%). The area under the ROC curve was significantly higher for the Tina-quant as compared to the other assays. Using standard cut-off values, sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV) and specificity of the Asserachrom were 97, 94 and 33%, respectively. For the VIDAS New, values were 100, 96 and 8%, respectively. The Tina-quant showed values of 99, 98 and 41%, respectively, and the STA-LIA 98, 95 and 32%. Values for the Miniquant were 95, 94 and 52%. The d-dimer assays in our study all show a high sensitivity and negative predictive value, but none of the assays reached an NPV of > 98% at standard cut-off values. d-Dimer assays with a low specificity still necessitate additional diagnostic tests in the majority of the patients.

摘要

D - 二聚体检测是排除静脉血栓形成的一项有前景的工具。新的D - 二聚体检测方法已被引入,但需要临床验证。我们的目的是评估四种相对较新的D - 二聚体检测方法和一种经典酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)在疑似深静脉血栓形成的门诊患者中的临床实用性。在一项使用临床概率评分和D - 二聚体检测(Tina - quant)的大型前瞻性管理研究中的537名患者中,额外采集样本使用Asserachrom ELISA、VIDAS New、STA - LIA和Miniquant检测方法进行D - 二聚体检测。使用3个月随访期间的临床数据计算每种检测方法的性能。224名患者(42%)检测到血栓形成。与其他检测方法相比,Tina - quant的ROC曲线下面积显著更高。使用标准临界值时,Asserachrom的敏感性、阴性预测值(NPV)和特异性分别为97%、94%和33%。VIDAS New的相应值分别为100%、96%和8%。Tina - quant的相应值分别为99%、98%和41%,STA - LIA为98%、95%和32%。Miniquant的相应值为95%、94%和52%。我们研究中的D - 二聚体检测方法均显示出高敏感性和阴性预测值,但在标准临界值时,没有一种检测方法的NPV达到>98%。特异性较低的D - 二聚体检测方法在大多数患者中仍需要进行额外的诊断测试。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验