Suppr超能文献

两种相对较新的定量 D-二聚体检测方法(Innovance D-dimer 和 AxSYM D-dimer)在排除深静脉血栓中的性能。

Performance of two relatively new quantitative D-dimer assays (Innovance D-dimer and AxSYM D-dimer) for the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis.

机构信息

Dept of Emergency Medicine, Lund University, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Thromb Res. 2009 Dec;124(6):701-5. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.07.008. Epub 2009 Aug 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

D-dimer assays are now widely used as the first-line test in the diagnostic algorithm of suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of two relatively new quantitative D-Dimer assays (Innovance and AxSYM) by comparison with a clinical gold standard.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

311 samples from outpatients with clinical suspicion of DVT, included in a prospective management study, was analysed (prevalence of DVT 23%). The diagnostic workup included estimation of pre-test probability, D-dimer determination, objective imaging as well as 3 month clinical follow up of negative patients.

RESULTS

No significant differences were seen in sensitivity and negative predictive values between Innovance, AxSYM and the reference assays. The area under the ROC curve was slightly lower for the AxSYM assay and the correlation to the reference assays was only moderate (r < 0.8) whereas the agreement with the Vidas assay was near excellent (kappa = 0.8). The Innovance assay reached the highest AUC, showed a strong correlation with the reference assays (r > or = 0.9) and a good agreement with the Vidas assay (kappa = 0.76). In combination with a low pre-test probability score the Innovance assay reached a NPV of 100% (95% CI, 92-100) and the AxSYM assay 98% (95% CI, 87-100).

CONCLUSION

The Innovance and AxSYM assays show an overall good and comparable performance for the exclusion of DVT when compared to the established assays. Our results for the AxSYM assay indicate that the optimal cut-off value needs to be further evaluated.

摘要

简介

D-二聚体检测现已广泛用于疑似深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的诊断算法中的一线检测。本研究旨在通过与临床金标准比较,评估两种相对较新的定量 D-二聚体检测方法(Innovance 和 AxSYM)的性能。

患者和方法

对纳入前瞻性管理研究的 311 例门诊疑似 DVT 患者的样本进行分析(DVT 患病率为 23%)。诊断性检查包括评估先验概率、D-二聚体测定、客观成像以及对阴性患者进行 3 个月的临床随访。

结果

Innovance、AxSYM 和参考检测方法之间在敏感性和阴性预测值方面无显著差异。AxSYM 检测的 ROC 曲线下面积略低,与参考检测方法的相关性仅中等(r < 0.8),而与 Vidas 检测的一致性接近极好(kappa = 0.8)。Innovance 检测达到最高 AUC,与参考检测方法具有很强的相关性(r > 0.9),与 Vidas 检测具有良好的一致性(kappa = 0.76)。与低先验概率评分相结合,Innovance 检测的阴性预测值达到 100%(95%CI,92-100),AxSYM 检测为 98%(95%CI,87-100)。

结论

与已建立的检测方法相比,Innovance 和 AxSYM 检测方法在排除 DVT 方面总体表现良好且相当。我们对 AxSYM 检测方法的结果表明,需要进一步评估最佳截断值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验