• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三剂与延长疗程克林霉素预防对头颈部游离皮瓣重建的效果比较

Three-dose vs extended-course clindamycin prophylaxis for free-flap reconstruction of the head and neck.

作者信息

Carroll William R, Rosenstiel David, Fix Jobe R, de la Torre Jorge, Solomon Joel S, Brodish Brian, Rosenthal Eben L, Heinz Tad, Niwas Santosh, Peters Glenn E

机构信息

Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 35233, USA.

出版信息

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Jul;129(7):771-4. doi: 10.1001/archotol.129.7.771.

DOI:10.1001/archotol.129.7.771
PMID:12874080
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Twenty-four hours of perioperative antibiotics provides effective prophylaxis for most head and neck cancer resections. Many reconstructive surgeons have been hesitant to apply this standard to free-flap reconstruction of the head and neck. This prospective clinical trial compared short-course and long-course clindamycin prophylaxis for wound infection in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing free-flap reconstruction.

METHODS

Seventy-four patients were randomized to receive short-course (3 doses) or long-course (15 doses) clindamycin perioperatively. Wound infections, fistulas, and other postoperative complications were documented by faculty surgeons who were blinded as to treatment group.

RESULTS

The differences in wound infections and other complications were statistically insignificant. No other independent predictors of wound complications emerged in this series of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-course clindamycin is as effective as long-course clindamycin in preventing wound infections after free-flap surgery for head and neck ablative defects.

摘要

背景

围手术期24小时使用抗生素可为大多数头颈癌切除术提供有效的预防措施。许多重建外科医生一直不愿将这一标准应用于头颈游离皮瓣重建手术。这项前瞻性临床试验比较了短期和长期使用克林霉素预防头颈癌游离皮瓣重建患者伤口感染的效果。

方法

74例患者被随机分为围手术期接受短期(3剂)或长期(15剂)克林霉素治疗组。伤口感染、瘘管及其他术后并发症由对治疗组不知情的外科医生记录。

结果

伤口感染及其他并发症的差异无统计学意义。在这组患者中未发现其他伤口并发症的独立预测因素。

结论

在预防头颈切除术后游离皮瓣手术伤口感染方面,短期使用克林霉素与长期使用克林霉素效果相同。

相似文献

1
Three-dose vs extended-course clindamycin prophylaxis for free-flap reconstruction of the head and neck.三剂与延长疗程克林霉素预防对头颈部游离皮瓣重建的效果比较
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Jul;129(7):771-4. doi: 10.1001/archotol.129.7.771.
2
Prophylactic antibiotics administration head and neck cancer surgery with major flap reconstruction: 1-day cefoperazone versus 5-day cefotaxime.
Acta Chir Plast. 1998;40(2):36-40.
3
The role of topical antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing contaminated head and neck surgery with flap reconstruction.局部抗生素预防在接受污染性头颈部手术并进行皮瓣重建患者中的作用。
Laryngoscope. 2001 Feb;111(2):329-35. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200102000-00026.
4
Antibiotics in head and neck surgery in the setting of malnutrition, tracheotomy, and diabetes.营养不良、气管切开术及糖尿病情况下头颈部手术中的抗生素应用
Laryngoscope. 2009 Mar;119(3):549-53. doi: 10.1002/lary.20078.
5
Short-term versus long-term antimicrobial prophylaxis in oncologic head and neck surgery.肿瘤头颈外科手术中短期与长期抗菌药物预防
Head Neck. 1996 Sep-Oct;18(5):399-404. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0347(199609/10)18:5<399::AID-HED2>3.0.CO;2-0.
6
Preliminary report of associated factors in wound infection after major head and neck neoplasm operations--does the duration of prophylactic antibiotic matter?头颈部重大肿瘤手术后伤口感染相关因素的初步报告——预防性抗生素的使用时长重要吗?
J Laryngol Otol. 2008 Apr;122(4):403-8. doi: 10.1017/S0022215107007529. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
7
Microsurgical free flap reconstruction outcomes in head and neck cancer patients after surgical extirpation and intraoperative brachytherapy.头颈部癌症患者手术切除及术中近距离放疗后显微外科游离皮瓣重建的结果
Laryngoscope. 2004 Jul;114(7):1170-6. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200407000-00007.
8
Risk factors for surgical-site infections in head and neck cancer surgery.头颈癌手术中手术部位感染的危险因素。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Jan;138(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.09.018.
9
The role of preoperative prophylactic antibiotic administration in periapical endodontic surgery: a randomized, prospective double-blind placebo-controlled study.术前预防性使用抗生素在根尖周牙髓外科手术中的作用:一项随机、前瞻性双盲安慰剂对照研究。
Int Endod J. 2005 Dec;38(12):877-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01030.x.
10
[Antibiotic prophylaxis in major surgery of the neck and head].
Minerva Chir. 1989 Nov 30;44(22):2341-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol improves patient outcomes in free flap surgery for head and neck cancer.术后加速康复(ERAS)方案改善了头颈部癌症游离皮瓣手术患者的预后。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Feb;281(2):907-914. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08292-3. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
2
Clinical consequences of head and neck free-flap reconstructions in the DM population.头颈部游离皮瓣重建术在糖尿病患者中的临床后果。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 16;11(1):6034. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85410-3.
3
Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: is the clinical practice based on evidence?
外科抗生素预防:临床实践是否基于证据?
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2020 Nov 20;18:eAO5427. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO5427. eCollection 2020.
4
Remote ischemic preconditioning does not influence lectin pathway protein levels in head and neck cancer patients undergoing surgery.远程缺血预处理不会影响头颈部癌症手术患者的凝集素途径蛋白水平。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 8;15(4):e0230411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230411. eCollection 2020.
5
Perioperative Antibiotics in Clean-Contaminated Head and Neck Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.头颈部清洁-污染手术围手术期抗生素应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2020 Apr;37(4):1360-1380. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01269-2. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
6
Evaluation of Prolonged vs Short Courses of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Following Ear, Nose, Throat, and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.耳鼻喉、口腔颌面外科手术后抗生素预防的长疗程与短疗程比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Jul 1;145(7):610-616. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.0879.
7
Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean-contaminated head and neck cases with microvascular free flap reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.在接受微血管游离皮瓣重建的清洁-污染性头颈部病例中使用抗生素预防:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Head Neck. 2018 Feb;40(2):417-427. doi: 10.1002/hed.24988. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
8
Antibiotic Use after Free Tissue Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects: Short Course vs. Long Course.头颈部缺损游离组织重建术后的抗生素使用:短疗程与长疗程对比
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Feb;17(1):100-5. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.131. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
9
Using information technology to reduce the inappropriate use of surgical prophylactic antibiotic.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Sep;265(9):1109-12. doi: 10.1007/s00405-008-0588-x. Epub 2008 Feb 2.
10
Prevention and Treatment of Postsurgical Head and Neck Infections.术后头颈部感染的预防与治疗
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2004 Jun;6(3):172-180. doi: 10.1007/s11908-004-0005-6.