Suppr超能文献

在接受微血管游离皮瓣重建的清洁-污染性头颈部病例中使用抗生素预防:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean-contaminated head and neck cases with microvascular free flap reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Haidar Yarah M, Tripathi Prem B, Tjoa Tjoson, Walia Sartaaj, Zhang Lishi, Chen Yanjun, Nguyen Danh V, Mahboubi Hossein, Armstrong William B, Goddard Julie A

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California - Irvine, Irvine, California.

Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California.

出版信息

Head Neck. 2018 Feb;40(2):417-427. doi: 10.1002/hed.24988. Epub 2017 Oct 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimal antibiotic prophylaxis duration in head and neck clean-contaminated free-flap cases is unknown.

METHODS

A systematic review/meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web-of-Science, and Scopus databases.

RESULTS

Of the 3755 searched articles, 5 articles were included for a total of 861 patients. The recipient surgical site infection risk was significantly higher in patients receiving prophylactic antibiotics for ≤24 hours compared to >24 hours (relative risk [RR] 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-2.14). In the post hoc multivariate analysis based on available individual-level data on 697 patients from 3 studies, the risk of surgical site infection for ≤24 hours versus >24 hours was not significant after adjusting for antibiotic type (RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.78-1.55). When compared to ampicillin-sulbactam, patients who received clindamycin prophylaxis had an increased likelihood of recipient surgical site infection (RR 2.85; 95% CI 1.95-4.17).

CONCLUSION

Less than or equal to 24 hours of antibiotic prophylaxis in head and neck clean-contaminated free-flap is likely sufficient but a strong conclusion remains elusive. Clindamycin prophylaxis increases the risk of recipient surgical site infection. Further prospective trials are necessary to clarify.

摘要

背景

头颈部清洁-污染游离皮瓣手术中最佳抗生素预防使用时长尚不清楚。

方法

利用PubMed/MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆、科学网和Scopus数据库进行系统评价/荟萃分析。

结果

在检索到的3755篇文章中,纳入了5篇文章,共861例患者。与接受预防性抗生素治疗超过24小时的患者相比,接受预防性抗生素治疗≤24小时的患者接受手术部位感染的风险显著更高(相对风险[RR]1.56;95%置信区间[CI]1.13-2.14)。在基于来自3项研究的697例患者的可用个体水平数据进行的事后多变量分析中,调整抗生素类型后,≤24小时与>24小时的手术部位感染风险无显著差异(RR 1.09;95%CI 0.78-1.55)。与氨苄西林-舒巴坦相比,接受克林霉素预防的患者发生接受手术部位感染的可能性增加(RR 2.85;95%CI 1.95-4.17)。

结论

头颈部清洁-污染游离皮瓣手术中抗生素预防使用≤24小时可能足够,但仍难以得出强有力的结论。克林霉素预防会增加接受手术部位感染的风险。需要进一步的前瞻性试验来阐明。

相似文献

2
Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction.头颈部游离皮瓣重建患者的抗生素预防
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Dec;141(12):1096-103. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.0513.

引用本文的文献

7
Surgical wound classification in otolaryngology: A state-of-the-art review.耳鼻喉科手术伤口分类:最新综述。
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Apr 18;8(2):139-144. doi: 10.1002/wjo2.63. eCollection 2022 Jun.

本文引用的文献

5
Laryngectomy Complications Are Associated with Perioperative Antibiotic Choice.喉切除术并发症与围手术期抗生素的选择有关。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Jul;153(1):60-8. doi: 10.1177/0194599815583641. Epub 2015 May 5.
6
Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction.头颈部游离皮瓣重建患者的抗生素预防
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Dec;141(12):1096-103. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.0513.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验