Alanis A, Longest K A, Senetar J E, Dere W H
Lilly Indiana de España, Lilly S.A., Madrid, Spain.
Postgrad Med J. 1992;68 Suppl 3:S24-8, discussion S29.
Two prospective randomized, double-blind, parallel studies were carried out in Europe to compare cefaclor advanced formulation (cefaclor AF) with cefaclor in the treatment of acute bronchitis caused by susceptible pathogens. A total of 1,321 patients suffering from acute bronchitis confirmed by clinical data and a negative chest X-ray were randomized for treatment in the two multicentre trials. Three doses of cefaclor AF were tested: 375 mg twice daily and 500 mg twice daily were compared with cefaclor 250 mg three times daily; and cefaclor AF 750 mg twice daily was compared with cefaclor 500 mg three times daily. Duration of therapy was seven days. Assessments (complete history, physical examination, sputum specimens for culture and Gram's stain, plus clinical and laboratory evaluations of safety) were carried out within 24 hours before the first dose, during therapy, within 72 hours after therapy completion and, in the 375 mg and 500 mg dose groups, 1-2 weeks after the end of therapy. There were no significant differences between the total evaluable cefaclor AF population and the total evaluable cefaclor population with regard to favourable post-therapy responses. Most favourable clinical and bacteriological response rates in the 375 and 500 mg doses were 80% or above. In the higher dose group, there was a favourable post-therapy symptomatic response in 100% of evaluable patients, with favourable bacteriological responses in 93.3% patients receiving cefaclor AF and 96.8% receiving cefaclor (no significant difference). Only one serious drug-related adverse event was reported (anaphylactic reaction). Adverse events related to the digestive system were reported by 4.7% of the cefaclor AF-treated patients and 4.5% of the cefaclor-treated patients during the entire study period. Cefaclor AF, at all three dose levels studies, was seen to be as safe as cefaclor in the treatment of acute bronchitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis.
在欧洲开展了两项前瞻性随机、双盲、平行研究,以比较头孢克洛新剂型(头孢克洛AF)与头孢克洛治疗由易感病原体引起的急性支气管炎的效果。共有1321例经临床数据确诊且胸部X线检查呈阴性的急性支气管炎患者被随机分配到这两项多中心试验中接受治疗。对三种剂量的头孢克洛AF进行了测试:每日两次375毫克和每日两次500毫克的头孢克洛AF与每日三次250毫克的头孢克洛进行比较;每日两次750毫克的头孢克洛AF与每日三次500毫克的头孢克洛进行比较。治疗疗程为7天。在首次给药前24小时内、治疗期间、治疗结束后72小时内以及375毫克和500毫克剂量组在治疗结束后1 - 2周进行评估(完整病史、体格检查、痰标本培养及革兰氏染色,以及安全性的临床和实验室评估)。在治疗后良好反应方面,可评估的头孢克洛AF总体人群与可评估的头孢克洛总体人群之间无显著差异。375毫克和500毫克剂量组中最有利的临床和细菌学反应率为80%或更高。在高剂量组中,100%的可评估患者治疗后有良好的症状反应,接受头孢克洛AF治疗的患者中有93.3%细菌学反应良好,接受头孢克洛治疗的患者中有96.8%细菌学反应良好(无显著差异)。仅报告了1例严重的药物相关不良事件(过敏反应)。在整个研究期间,4.7%接受头孢克洛AF治疗的患者和4.5%接受头孢克洛治疗的患者报告了与消化系统相关的不良事件。在所有三个剂量水平的研究中,头孢克洛AF在治疗由肺炎链球菌、流感嗜血杆菌和卡他莫拉菌(布兰汉菌)引起的急性支气管炎方面与头孢克洛一样安全。