Erlandsson Kjell, Bressan Rodrigo A, Mulligan Rachel S, Ell Peter J, Cunningham Vincent J, Pilowsky Lyn S
Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, London, UK.
Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):1205-14. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00166-6.
Recent studies of limbic cortical dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy by clozapine using high-affinity PET and SPET radioligands have produced conflicting findings. It has been suggested that these divergent findings are due to between-study differences in the method used to estimate D(2) receptor-binding potential. We compared different methods for estimating striatal and temporal cortical D(2) receptor occupancy with high-affinity tracers. In vivo experimental SPET data, obtained with [(123)I]epidepride were analysed with reference tissue kinetic modeling and with the ratio method, applied to data corresponding to short (60 min) and long (240 min) acquisition times. Dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy by the atypical antipsychotic drug risperidone was evaluated. Simulation experiments were also performed, comparing occupancy values obtained for different receptor densities in relation to different data acquisition times. The simulation results revealed that previously published data regarding errors in occupancy estimation by analysis of time activity data acquired for 60 min cannot be extrapolated to studies performed over 240 min. The ratio method provided accurate temporal cortical D(2) receptor occupancy values when applied to data from a late time period, but underestimated the occupancy with earlier data. In striatum, both the late data ratio method and reference tissue kinetic modeling using all data underestimated D(2) receptor occupancy. However, more accurate analyses of striatal D(2) occupancy still showed selective limbic/cortical occupancy by risperidone. Our results substantiate the previous [(123)I]epidepride findings of high temporal cortical occupancy by other atypical antipsychotic drugs and suggest that a potential source of conflicting findings might be short scanning times imposed by [(11)C]FLB 457, leading to underestimation of temporal cortical D(2) receptor occupancy by this method.
近期使用高亲和力正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPET)放射性配体对氯氮平占据边缘皮质多巴胺D(2)受体的研究得出了相互矛盾的结果。有人认为,这些不同的结果是由于研究之间在估计D(2)受体结合潜能的方法上存在差异。我们比较了使用高亲和力示踪剂估计纹状体和颞叶皮质D(2)受体占有率的不同方法。对用[(123)I]表哌立登获得的体内实验SPET数据,采用参考组织动力学模型和比率法进行分析,该比率法应用于对应于短(60分钟)和长(240分钟)采集时间的数据。评估了非典型抗精神病药物利培酮对多巴胺D(2)受体的占有率。还进行了模拟实验,比较了在不同数据采集时间下不同受体密度获得的占有率值。模拟结果表明,先前发表的关于通过分析60分钟采集的时间-活性数据进行占有率估计误差的数据,不能外推到240分钟的研究。当将比率法应用于后期时间段的数据时,能提供准确的颞叶皮质D(2)受体占有率值,但对早期数据的占有率估计偏低。在纹状体中,后期数据比率法和使用所有数据的参考组织动力学模型都低估了D(2)受体占有率。然而,对纹状体D(2)占有率更准确的分析仍显示利培酮具有选择性边缘/皮质占有率。我们的结果证实了先前[(123)I]表哌立登关于其他非典型抗精神病药物具有高颞叶皮质占有率的发现,并表明结果相互矛盾的一个潜在原因可能是[(11)C]FLB 457施加的短扫描时间,导致该方法低估了颞叶皮质D(2)受体占有率。