Kelly Peter J, Furie Karen L, Shafqat Saad, Rallis Nikoletta, Chang Yuchiao, Stein Joel
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Jul;84(7):968-72. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00040-6.
To quantify recovery after rehabilitation therapy and to identify factors that predicted functional outcome in survivors of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) compared with cerebral infarction.
Retrospective study of consecutive ICH and cerebral infarction admissions to a rehabilitation hospital over a 4-year period.
Free-standing urban rehabilitation hospital.
A total of 1064 cases met the inclusion criteria (545 women, 519 men; 871 with cerebral infarction, 193 with ICH).
Not applicable.
Functional status was measured using the FIM trade mark instrument, recorded at admission and discharge. Recovery was quantified by the change in FIM total score (DeltaFIM total score). Outcome measures were total discharge FIM score and DeltaFIM total score. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.
Total admission FIM score was higher in patients with cerebral infarction than in patients with ICH (59 vs 51, P=.0001). No difference in total discharge FIM score was present. Patients with ICH made a significantly greater recovery than those with cerebral infarction (DeltaFIM total score, 28 vs 23.3; P=.002). On multivariate analysis, younger age, longer length of stay, and admission FIM cognitive subscore independently predicted total discharge FIM and DeltaFIM total score. The severity of disability at admission, indicated by total admission FIM score, independently predicted total discharge FIM score, but not DeltaFIM total score. The ICH patients with the most severely disabling strokes had significantly greater recovery than cerebral infarction patients with stroke of similar severity.
The patients with ICH had greater functional impairment than the cerebral infarction patients at admission, but made greater gains. Patients with the most severely disabling ICH improved more than those with cerebral infarction of comparable severity. Initial severity of disability, age, and duration of therapy best predicted functional outcome after rehabilitation.
量化康复治疗后的恢复情况,并确定与脑梗死相比,脑出血(ICH)幸存者功能预后的预测因素。
对一家康复医院4年期间连续收治的ICH和脑梗死患者进行回顾性研究。
独立的城市康复医院。
共有1064例符合纳入标准(女性545例,男性519例;脑梗死871例,ICH 193例)。
不适用。
使用FIM商标工具测量功能状态,在入院和出院时记录。通过FIM总分变化(ΔFIM总分)量化恢复情况。观察指标为出院时FIM总分和ΔFIM总分。进行单因素和多因素分析。
脑梗死患者入院时FIM总分高于ICH患者(59分对51分,P = 0.0001)。出院时FIM总分无差异。ICH患者的恢复明显大于脑梗死患者(ΔFIM总分,28分对23.3分;P = 0.002)。多因素分析显示,年龄较小、住院时间较长和入院时FIM认知子评分独立预测出院时FIM总分和ΔFIM总分。入院时FIM总分所表明的入院时残疾严重程度独立预测出院时FIM总分,但不能预测ΔFIM总分。中风致残最严重的ICH患者比病情严重程度相似的脑梗死患者恢复得明显更好。
ICH患者入院时的功能损害比脑梗死患者更大,但恢复程度更大。中风致残最严重的ICH患者比病情相当的脑梗死患者改善更多。残疾的初始严重程度、年龄和治疗持续时间最能预测康复后的功能预后。