Stabel Henriette Holm, Pedersen Asger Roer, Johnsen Søren Paaske, Nielsen Jørgen Feldbæk
Hammel Neurorehabilitation Centre and University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Hammel, Denmark.
Hammel Neurorehabilitation Centre and University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Hammel, Denmark.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Apr;98(4):759-765. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
To compare the changes in functional independence measured by the FIM after specialized neurorehabilitation between patients with nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) or acute ischemic stroke (AIS).
Historical cohort study comparing changes in functional independence between patients with nontraumatic SAH and those with ICH/AIS, using FIM scores from a local database and clinical information from the Danish National Patient Registry.
Postacute specialized inpatient neurorehabilitation.
Participants (N=660) comprised patients with a first-time nontraumatic SAH (n=212) and age-matched patients with a first-time ICH/AIS (n=448).
Not applicable.
Crude and adjusted comparisons of FIM (total and item by item) measured at baseline and at discharge.
Patients with nontraumatic SAH were admitted with a lower functional level compared with patients with ICH/AIS (median total FIM score, 25 [interquartile range (IQR), 18-81] vs 78.5 [IQR, 47-107]), and discharged with a lower functional level (median total FIM score, 98 [IQR, 40-116] vs 110 [IQR, 82.5-119]), although they made more progress during neurorehabilitation (median change in total FIM score, 27 [IQR, 4-60] vs 17 [IQR, 7-35]). Statistically, patients with nontraumatic SAH had significantly better odds for obtaining functional independence than did patients with ICH/AIS in 6 of the 18 FIM items: eating (odds ratio [OR]=3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-5.8); dressing-upper body (OR=2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.5); transfer tub/shower (OR=2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.6); stair walking (OR=2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.7); comprehension (OR=2.3; 95% CI, 1.3-3.9); and expression (OR=3.6; 95% CI, 2.0-6.5).
Patients with nontraumatic SAH made significantly more progress during neurorehabilitation, although they were discharged with a lower level of functional independence compared with patients with ICH/AIS. However, both patients with nontraumatic SAH and those with ICH/AIS improved their functional outcome significantly. Also, patients with nontraumatic SAH admitted with severe functional outcome were shown to be capable of recovering to a moderate level of functional independence.
比较非创伤性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)患者与脑出血(ICH)或急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者在接受专业神经康复治疗后,通过功能独立性测量量表(FIM)评估的功能变化。
历史性队列研究,利用本地数据库中的FIM评分和丹麦国家患者登记处的临床信息,比较非创伤性SAH患者与ICH/AIS患者的功能独立性变化。
急性后期专业住院神经康复机构。
参与者(N = 660)包括首次发生非创伤性SAH的患者(n = 212)和年龄匹配的首次发生ICH/AIS的患者(n = 448)。
不适用。
基线和出院时测量的FIM(总分及逐项)的原始和校正比较。
与ICH/AIS患者相比,非创伤性SAH患者入院时功能水平较低(FIM总分中位数,25[四分位数间距(IQR),18 - 81] vs 78.5[IQR,47 - 107]),出院时功能水平也较低(FIM总分中位数,98[IQR,40 - 116] vs 110[IQR,82.5 - 119]),尽管他们在神经康复过程中进步更大(FIM总分中位数变化,27[IQR,4 - 60] vs 17[IQR,7 - 35])。在统计学上,在18项FIM项目中的6项中,非创伤性SAH患者获得功能独立的几率显著高于ICH/AIS患者:进食(优势比[OR]=3.2;95%置信区间[CI],1.7 - 5.8);上身穿衣(OR = 2.0;95% CI,1.1 - 3.5);从浴缸/淋浴间转移(OR = 2.0;95% CI,1.1 - 3.6);上下楼梯(OR = 2.2;95% CI,1.3 - 3.7);理解能力(OR = 2.3;95% CI,1.3 - 3.9);表达能力(OR = 3.6;95% CI,2.0 - 6.5)。
非创伤性SAH患者在神经康复过程中进步显著,尽管与ICH/AIS患者相比,出院时功能独立水平较低。然而,非创伤性SAH患者和ICH/AIS患者的功能结局均有显著改善。此外,入院时功能结局严重的非创伤性SAH患者能够恢复到中等程度的功能独立水平。