• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

功能独立性:非创伤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者与脑出血或急性缺血性脑卒中患者在神经康复过程中的变化比较。

Functional Independence: A Comparison of the Changes During Neurorehabilitation Between Patients With Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage or Acute Ischemic Stroke.

作者信息

Stabel Henriette Holm, Pedersen Asger Roer, Johnsen Søren Paaske, Nielsen Jørgen Feldbæk

机构信息

Hammel Neurorehabilitation Centre and University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Hammel, Denmark.

Hammel Neurorehabilitation Centre and University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Hammel, Denmark.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Apr;98(4):759-765. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.11.010
PMID:27993584
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the changes in functional independence measured by the FIM after specialized neurorehabilitation between patients with nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) or acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

DESIGN

Historical cohort study comparing changes in functional independence between patients with nontraumatic SAH and those with ICH/AIS, using FIM scores from a local database and clinical information from the Danish National Patient Registry.

SETTING

Postacute specialized inpatient neurorehabilitation.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants (N=660) comprised patients with a first-time nontraumatic SAH (n=212) and age-matched patients with a first-time ICH/AIS (n=448).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Crude and adjusted comparisons of FIM (total and item by item) measured at baseline and at discharge.

RESULTS

Patients with nontraumatic SAH were admitted with a lower functional level compared with patients with ICH/AIS (median total FIM score, 25 [interquartile range (IQR), 18-81] vs 78.5 [IQR, 47-107]), and discharged with a lower functional level (median total FIM score, 98 [IQR, 40-116] vs 110 [IQR, 82.5-119]), although they made more progress during neurorehabilitation (median change in total FIM score, 27 [IQR, 4-60] vs 17 [IQR, 7-35]). Statistically, patients with nontraumatic SAH had significantly better odds for obtaining functional independence than did patients with ICH/AIS in 6 of the 18 FIM items: eating (odds ratio [OR]=3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-5.8); dressing-upper body (OR=2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.5); transfer tub/shower (OR=2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.6); stair walking (OR=2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.7); comprehension (OR=2.3; 95% CI, 1.3-3.9); and expression (OR=3.6; 95% CI, 2.0-6.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with nontraumatic SAH made significantly more progress during neurorehabilitation, although they were discharged with a lower level of functional independence compared with patients with ICH/AIS. However, both patients with nontraumatic SAH and those with ICH/AIS improved their functional outcome significantly. Also, patients with nontraumatic SAH admitted with severe functional outcome were shown to be capable of recovering to a moderate level of functional independence.

摘要

目的

比较非创伤性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)患者与脑出血(ICH)或急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者在接受专业神经康复治疗后,通过功能独立性测量量表(FIM)评估的功能变化。

设计

历史性队列研究,利用本地数据库中的FIM评分和丹麦国家患者登记处的临床信息,比较非创伤性SAH患者与ICH/AIS患者的功能独立性变化。

地点

急性后期专业住院神经康复机构。

参与者

参与者(N = 660)包括首次发生非创伤性SAH的患者(n = 212)和年龄匹配的首次发生ICH/AIS的患者(n = 448)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

基线和出院时测量的FIM(总分及逐项)的原始和校正比较。

结果

与ICH/AIS患者相比,非创伤性SAH患者入院时功能水平较低(FIM总分中位数,25[四分位数间距(IQR),18 - 81] vs 78.5[IQR,47 - 107]),出院时功能水平也较低(FIM总分中位数,98[IQR,40 - 116] vs 110[IQR,82.5 - 119]),尽管他们在神经康复过程中进步更大(FIM总分中位数变化,27[IQR,4 - 60] vs 17[IQR,7 - 35])。在统计学上,在18项FIM项目中的6项中,非创伤性SAH患者获得功能独立的几率显著高于ICH/AIS患者:进食(优势比[OR]=3.2;95%置信区间[CI],1.7 - 5.8);上身穿衣(OR = 2.0;95% CI,1.1 - 3.5);从浴缸/淋浴间转移(OR = 2.0;95% CI,1.1 - 3.6);上下楼梯(OR = 2.2;95% CI,1.3 - 3.7);理解能力(OR = 2.3;95% CI,1.3 - 3.9);表达能力(OR = 3.6;95% CI,2.0 - 6.5)。

结论

非创伤性SAH患者在神经康复过程中进步显著,尽管与ICH/AIS患者相比,出院时功能独立水平较低。然而,非创伤性SAH患者和ICH/AIS患者的功能结局均有显著改善。此外,入院时功能结局严重的非创伤性SAH患者能够恢复到中等程度的功能独立水平。

相似文献

1
Functional Independence: A Comparison of the Changes During Neurorehabilitation Between Patients With Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage or Acute Ischemic Stroke.功能独立性:非创伤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者与脑出血或急性缺血性脑卒中患者在神经康复过程中的变化比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Apr;98(4):759-765. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
2
Rupture of a non-traumatic anterior communicating artery aneurysm: Does location of aneurysm associate with functional independence following post-acute in-patient neurorehabilitation?非创伤性前交通动脉瘤破裂:动脉瘤位置与急性后期住院神经康复后的功能独立性是否相关?
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017 Dec;24(8):585-591. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2017.1373973. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
3
Do stroke patients with intracerebral hemorrhage have a better functional outcome than patients with cerebral infarction?脑出血性中风患者的功能预后是否比脑梗塞患者更好?
PM R. 2009 May;1(5):427-33. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.03.002.
4
Functional recovery following rehabilitation after hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke.出血性和缺血性中风康复后的功能恢复
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Jul;84(7):968-72. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00040-6.
5
Recovery and rehabilitation following subarachnoid haemorrhage. Part I: Outcome after inpatient rehabilitation.蛛网膜下腔出血后的康复与恢复。第一部分:住院康复后的结局
Brain Inj. 1998 Jun;12(6):443-54. doi: 10.1080/026990598122412.
6
Effect of an evidence-based mobility intervention on the level of function in acute intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhagic stroke patients on a neurointensive care unit.基于证据的移动性干预对神经重症监护病房中急性脑出血和蛛网膜下腔出血性中风患者功能水平的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jul;96(7):1191-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
7
Impact of intracerebral hemorrhage and cerebral infarction on ADL and outcome in stroke patients: A retrospective cohort study.脑出血和脑梗死对脑卒中患者 ADL 和预后的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2024;55(1):41-49. doi: 10.3233/NRE-240182.
8
Higher risk of deep vein thrombosis after hemorrhagic stroke than after acute ischemic stroke.出血性卒中后发生深静脉血栓形成的风险高于急性缺血性卒中后。
J Vasc Nurs. 2019 Mar;37(1):18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2018.10.006. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
9
Functional outcome after inpatient rehabilitation in persons with subarachnoid hemorrhage.蛛网膜下腔出血患者住院康复后的功能结局。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 May;83(5):678-82. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.32305.
10
High Nutritional-Related Risk on Admission Predicts Less Improvement of Functional Independence Measure in Geriatric Stroke Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.入院时高营养相关风险预示老年卒中患者功能独立性测量改善较少:一项回顾性队列研究
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Jun;25(6):1335-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.01.048. Epub 2016 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Rehabilitation outcomes after comprehensive post-acute inpatient rehabilitation following moderate to severe acquired brain injury-study protocol for an overall prognosis study based on routinely collected health data.中度至重度获得性脑损伤后综合急性后期住院康复的康复结局——基于常规收集的健康数据进行总体预后研究的研究方案
Diagn Progn Res. 2025 Jan 7;9(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41512-024-00183-3.
2
Apathy in subarachnoid hemorrhage: study protocol for a 1-year follow-up study.蛛网膜下腔出血后的淡漠:一项为期1年随访研究的研究方案
Front Neurol. 2024 Jul 31;15:1358102. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1358102. eCollection 2024.
3
Assessment of rehabilitation following subarachnoid haemorrhage in China: findings from the Chinese Stroke Center Alliance.
中国蛛网膜下腔出血后康复评估:来自中国卒中中心联盟的研究结果。
BMC Neurol. 2023 Aug 5;23(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03349-6.
4
Essential information for neurorecovery clinical trial design: trajectory of global disability in first 90 days post-stroke in patients discharged to acute rehabilitation facilities.神经康复临床试验设计的基本信息:出院至急性康复设施的卒中后 90 天内全球残疾轨迹。
BMC Neurol. 2023 Jun 20;23(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03251-1.
5
Long-Term Clinical Trajectory of Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Linking Acute Care and Neurorehabilitation.蛛网膜下腔出血患者的长期临床轨迹:连接急性治疗和神经康复。
Neurocrit Care. 2023 Feb;38(1):138-148. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01572-6. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
6
Cohort profile: Design and implementation of the Danish Physiotherapy Research Database for patients receiving primary care with chronic disease.队列资料简介:丹麦针对接受慢性病初级保健患者的物理治疗研究数据库的设计和实施。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 3;10(11):e040207. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040207.
7
IMAGINE study protocol of a clinical trial: a multi-center, investigator-blinded, randomized, 36-month, parallel-group to compare the effectiveness of motivational interview in rehabilitation of older stroke survivors.想象研究协议的临床试验:一项多中心、研究者盲法、随机、36 个月、平行组比较动机访谈在老年脑卒中幸存者康复中的有效性。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Sep 4;20(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01694-6.