Fernández L, Heredia N, Peralta C, Xaus C, Roselló-Catafau J, Rimola A, Marco A, Serafín A, Deulofeu R, Gelpí E, Grande L
Department of Experimental Pathology, Instituto de Investigaciones August Pi i Sunyer, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Barcelona, Spain.
Transplantation. 2003 Jul 27;76(2):282-9. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000067529.82245.4E.
This study evaluates whether surgical strategies such as the portosystemic shunt and ischemic preconditioning can protect against hepatic and pulmonary injury associated with liver transplantation.
The effect of the portosystemic shunt, ischemic preconditioning, and both surgical procedures together were evaluated in rat liver transplantation. Alanine aminotransferase, hyaluronic acid levels in plasma, adenosine triphosphate and nucleotide levels in liver and edema, malondialdehyde levels, and myeloperoxidase activity were measured 24 hr posttransplantation. Plasmatic tumor necrosis factor (TNF) levels were measured as a possible proinflammatory factor responsible for hepatic and pulmonary damage associated with liver transplantation.
Hepatocyte and cell endothelial damage were observed in liver grafts subjected to 8 hr of cold ischemia. This was associated with increased plasma TNF levels and lung inflammatory response. Portosystemic shunt application in the recipient protected endothelial cells but did not confer an effective protection from hepatocyte damage or reduce the increased plasma TNF levels and lung damage after liver transplantation. However, preconditioning of the donor liver conferred protection against both the endothelial cell and hepatocyte damage observed after liver transplantation. Preconditioning also attenuated the increased plasma TNF release and pulmonary damage. The combination of both surgical strategies resulted in levels of liver injury, TNF, and lung damage similar to those seen after liver transplantation.
These findings indicate that ischemic preconditioning could be a preferred treatment to reduce hepatic and pulmonary damage associated with liver transplantation. However, this strategy may not be effective in several clinical situations requiring a portosystemic shunt.
本研究评估诸如门体分流术和缺血预处理等手术策略是否能预防与肝移植相关的肝和肺损伤。
在大鼠肝移植中评估门体分流术、缺血预处理以及这两种手术一起实施的效果。在移植后24小时测量丙氨酸转氨酶、血浆透明质酸水平、肝脏中的三磷酸腺苷和核苷酸水平以及水肿、丙二醛水平和髓过氧化物酶活性。测量血浆肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)水平,其可能是与肝移植相关的肝和肺损伤的促炎因子。
在经历8小时冷缺血的肝移植物中观察到肝细胞和内皮细胞损伤。这与血浆TNF水平升高和肺部炎症反应相关。受体实施门体分流术可保护内皮细胞,但不能有效保护肝细胞免受损伤,也不能降低肝移植后升高的血浆TNF水平和肺部损伤。然而,供体肝脏的预处理可预防肝移植后观察到的内皮细胞和肝细胞损伤。预处理还可减轻血浆TNF释放增加和肺部损伤。两种手术策略联合应用导致的肝损伤、TNF水平和肺部损伤与肝移植后所见相似。
这些发现表明,缺血预处理可能是减少与肝移植相关的肝和肺损伤的首选治疗方法。然而,在一些需要门体分流术的临床情况下,这种策略可能无效。