Håkansson Annika, Håkansson Leif, Gustafsson Bertil, Krysander Lennart, Rettrup Björn, Ruiter Dirk, Bernsen Monique R
Department of Oncology, Division of Clinical Tumour Immunology, Hand Surgery and Burns, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Melanoma Res. 2003 Aug;13(4):401-7. doi: 10.1097/00008390-200308000-00010.
Although immunotherapy and biochemotherapy have shown promise, producing a subset of durable responses, for the majority of patients with metastatic melanoma the prognosis is still poor. Therefore there is a great need for predictive tests to identify patients with a high probability of responding. Furthermore, there is also a need for a better understanding of the mechanisms of action during treatment in order to be able to monitor the relevant antitumour reactivity during treatment and to optimize the efficacy of future immunotherapy and biochemotherapy. In the present study histopathological regression criteria were used to study the efficacy of biochemotherapy. Thirty-two patients with metastatic malignant melanoma (18 with regional disease and 14 with systemic disease) were treated with biochemotherapy (cisplatin 30 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1-3, dacarbazine 250 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1-3 and interferon-alpha2b 10 million IU subcutaneously 3 days a week, every 28 days). Pre-treatment fine needle aspirates were obtained from metastases to analyse the number of tumour-infiltrating CD4+ lymphocytes. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated in metastases resected after treatment using histopathological criteria of tumour regression. Comparisons were also made with metastases from 17 untreated patients, all with regional disease. Regressive changes of 25% or more (of the section area) were found in two of the 17 untreated patients with regional disease compared with 13 of the 18 patients with regional disease and 10 of the 14 patients with systemic disease after biochemotherapy. Fifty per cent of the patients with regional disease showed a high degree of regressive changes (75-100% of the section area) after biochemotherapy. These results demonstrate the occurrence of an antitumour reactivity in the majority of patients. Patients with extensive regressive changes in 75-100% of the analysed biopsies were also found to have a longer overall survival (P = 0.019). In patients with regional disease there was a close correlation between a larger number of CD4+ lymphocytes pre-treatment and a higher degree of regressive changes post-treatment (P < 0.05). Thus, immunohistochemical analysis of tumour biopsies shortly after treatment seems to be a good surrogate endpoint. This technique also allows detailed analysis of antitumour reactivity and escape mechanisms.
尽管免疫疗法和生物化疗已显示出前景,能产生一部分持久反应,但对于大多数转移性黑色素瘤患者而言,预后仍然很差。因此,迫切需要预测性检测来识别有高反应概率的患者。此外,还需要更好地理解治疗期间的作用机制,以便能够在治疗期间监测相关的抗肿瘤反应性,并优化未来免疫疗法和生物化疗的疗效。在本研究中,组织病理学回归标准被用于研究生物化疗的疗效。32例转移性恶性黑色素瘤患者(18例为局部疾病,14例为全身疾病)接受了生物化疗(顺铂30mg/m²静脉注射,第1 - 3天;达卡巴嗪250mg/m²静脉注射,第1 - 3天;干扰素-α2b 1000万IU皮下注射,每周3天,每28天一次)。从转移灶获取治疗前细针穿刺抽吸物,以分析肿瘤浸润CD4⁺淋巴细胞的数量。使用肿瘤消退的组织病理学标准评估治疗后切除转移灶的治疗效果。还与17例未治疗患者(均为局部疾病)的转移灶进行了比较。在17例未治疗的局部疾病患者中,有2例出现了25%或更多(切片面积)的退行性变化,而生物化疗后,18例局部疾病患者中有13例、14例全身疾病患者中有10例出现了这种情况。50%的局部疾病患者在生物化疗后出现了高度退行性变化(切片面积的75 - 100%)。这些结果表明大多数患者出现了抗肿瘤反应。在75 - 100%的分析活检中出现广泛退行性变化的患者也被发现总生存期更长(P = 0.019)。在局部疾病患者中,治疗前CD4⁺淋巴细胞数量较多与治疗后更高程度的退行性变化密切相关(P < 0.05)。因此,治疗后不久对肿瘤活检进行免疫组织化学分析似乎是一个很好的替代终点。该技术还允许对抗肿瘤反应性和逃逸机制进行详细分析。