Sprung Juraj, Warner Mary E, Contreras Michael G, Schroeder Darrell R, Beighley Christopher M, Wilson Gregory A, Warner David O
Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Anesthesiology. 2003 Aug;99(2):259-69. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200308000-00006.
The authors determined the incidence of cardiac arrest and predictors of survival following perioperative cardiac arrest in a large population of patients at a tertiary referral center.
Medical records of patients who experienced cardiac arrest in the perioperative period surrounding noncardiac surgery between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2000, were reviewed. Logistic regression identified characteristics associated with immediate (>or= 1 h) and hospital survival, with P <or= 0.01 considered statistically significant.
Cardiac arrest occurred in 223 of 518,294 anesthetics (4.3 per 10,000) during the study period. Frequency of arrest for patients receiving general anesthesia decreased over time (7.8 per 10,000 during 1990-1992; 3.2 per 10,000 during 1998-2000). The frequency of arrest during regional anesthesia (1.5 per 10,000) and monitored anesthesia care (0.7 per 10,000) remained consistent. Immediate survival after arrest was 46.6%, and hospital survival was 34.5%. Twenty-four patients (0.5 per 10,000) had cardiac arrest related primarily to anesthesia. From multivariate analysis, patients who experienced arrest due to bleeding were less likely to survive hospitalization (P = 0.001). Survival was also lower for patients who experienced arrest during nonstandard working hours (P = 0.006) and for patients who had protracted hypotension before arrest (P < 0.001).
The overall frequency of arrest for patients receiving anesthesia decreased during the study period. Most arrests were not due to anesthesia-related causes, and most patients experiencing anesthesia-related arrest survived to hospital discharge. Although many factors determining survival may not be amenable to modification, the fact that arrests during nonregular working hours had worse outcomes may indicate that the availability of human resources influences survival.
作者在一家三级转诊中心的大量患者中确定了围手术期心脏骤停的发生率及心脏骤停后存活的预测因素。
回顾了1990年1月1日至2000年12月31日期间非心脏手术围手术期发生心脏骤停患者的病历。逻辑回归确定了与即刻(≥1小时)存活及住院存活相关的特征,P≤0.01被认为具有统计学意义。
在研究期间,518294例麻醉中有223例发生心脏骤停(每10000例中有4.3例)。接受全身麻醉患者的心脏骤停发生率随时间下降(1990 - 1992年期间为每10000例中有7.8例;1998 - 2000年期间为每10000例中有3.2例)。区域麻醉期间(每10000例中有1.5例)和监护麻醉管理期间(每10000例中有0.7例)的心脏骤停发生率保持稳定。心脏骤停后的即刻存活率为46.6%,住院存活率为34.5%。24例患者(每10000例中有0.5例)的心脏骤停主要与麻醉相关。多因素分析显示,因出血发生心脏骤停的患者住院存活可能性较小(P = 0.001)。非标准工作时间发生心脏骤停的患者存活率也较低(P = 0.006),心脏骤停前出现长时间低血压的患者存活率也较低(P < 0.001)。
在研究期间,接受麻醉患者的总体心脏骤停发生率下降。大多数心脏骤停并非由麻醉相关原因导致,且大多数发生麻醉相关心脏骤停的患者存活至出院。尽管许多决定存活的因素可能无法改变,但非正规工作时间发生心脏骤停的患者预后较差这一事实可能表明人力资源的可利用性会影响存活率。