Ludemann Robert, Watson David I, Jamieson Glyn G
University of Adelaide Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terruce, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia.
Am J Surg. 2003 Aug;186(2):143-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(03)00175-2.
Outcomes after surgery can be determined by face-to-face interview, interviewing patients by telephone, or by mailing out questionnaires. For reasons of convenience, many clinical research studies use mail survey methods. Mail-out responses, however, are rarely complete, and patients returning mail-out questionnaires might be different from patients who do not return questionnaires.
We identified a group of 75 patients who were all sent a mail-out questionnaire 5 or more years after a laparoscopic fundoplication. Some of these patients returned questionnaires and some did not. All patients were subsequently interviewed by telephone. The responses to the two different data collection methods were compared as well as the interview responses of patients who returned questionnaires with those of patients who did not to determine the influence of follow-up methodology on apparent clinical outcome.
Of the 75 patients interviewed, 49 patients (65%) had previously returned a mail-out questionnaire and 26 patients had not. The mean time difference between mail-out response and telephone interview was 1 month. When mail-out responses were compared with interview responses of the patients who had returned questionnaires, equivalent answers were obtained for all symptoms except for dysphagia, for which a higher incidence and greater scores were reported by patients in their mail-out questionnaire responses. When mail-out nonresponders were compared with responders, the nonresponders had a lower level of overall satisfaction with the outcome of surgery, a higher incidence of dysphagia, and greater levels of heartburn.
The measurement of surgical outcomes using a mail-out questionnaire may not be an accurate method of assessing patient symptoms and satisfaction after surgery, particularly if follow-up is incomplete. In this study, patients not responding to mail-out questionnaires were more likely to have adverse symptoms and a lower level of satisfaction than patients returning questionnaires. This dissatisfaction could make patients less likely to return mail-out questionnaires, and for this reason studies with incomplete follow-up that rely on mail-out questionnaire responses may report erroneously higher surgical success rates.
手术后的结果可以通过面对面访谈、电话访谈患者或邮寄问卷来确定。出于方便的原因,许多临床研究使用邮寄调查方法。然而,邮寄问卷的回复很少是完整的,回复邮寄问卷的患者可能与不回复问卷的患者不同。
我们确定了一组75名患者,他们在接受腹腔镜胃底折叠术5年或更长时间后都收到了一份邮寄问卷。其中一些患者回复了问卷,一些没有。随后对所有患者进行了电话访谈。比较了两种不同数据收集方法的回复,以及回复问卷的患者与未回复问卷的患者的访谈回复,以确定随访方法对明显临床结果的影响。
在接受访谈的75名患者中,49名患者(65%)此前回复了邮寄问卷,26名患者未回复。邮寄回复与电话访谈之间的平均时间差为1个月。当将邮寄回复与回复问卷的患者的访谈回复进行比较时,除吞咽困难外,所有症状的答案均一致,对于吞咽困难,患者在邮寄问卷回复中报告的发病率更高且得分更高。当将未回复邮寄问卷者与回复者进行比较时,未回复者对手术结果的总体满意度较低,吞咽困难的发病率较高,烧心程度也较高。
使用邮寄问卷来衡量手术结果可能不是评估患者术后症状和满意度的准确方法,特别是如果随访不完整。在本研究中,未回复邮寄问卷的患者比回复问卷的患者更有可能出现不良症状且满意度较低。这种不满可能使患者不太可能回复邮寄问卷,因此,依赖邮寄问卷回复且随访不完整的研究可能会错误地报告更高的手术成功率。