Dinkel H-P, Hochreiter W, Triller J
Institut für Diagnostische Radiologie, Inselspital, Universität Bern, Switzerland.
Rofo. 2003 Aug;175(8):1120-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40911.
To report feasibility, benefit and complications of penile angiography and superselective penile embolization in arterial priapism.
Four consecutive patients (aged 28, 29, 40 and 49 years), who underwent penile angiography for arterial priapism (high-flow priapism) within a four-year period, were identified by a keyword search of our radiology information system. One patient had sustained a direct penile trauma (severe blow to the erected penis) and three patients suffered from recurrent spontaneous priapism. All patients had previously undergone corporeal aspiration and noradrenaline injection to achieve detumescence. Two patients had one or several unsuccessful spongiocavernous shunt procedures.
In three of the four patients, superselective pudendal and penile angiography demonstrated pathologic arteriocavernous shunting. In two of the three patients, superselective embolization using a coaxial micro-catheter was attempted. In one of the two patients, the cavernous artery became spastic before embolization material was actually injected, inducing immediate and lasting detumescence. In the other patient, unilateral Gelfoam embolization led to immediate detumescence but the priapism recurred 12 hours after the procedure. A subsequent contralateral Gelfoam embolization was successful. Erectile function was preserved in all cases. No procedure-related complications occurred.
Our experience supports the prevailing opinion found in the current literature that superselective coaxial embolization constitutes the treatment of choice in patients with high-flow priapism. Prognosis is good with high probability of preserving the erectile function.
报告阴茎血管造影及超选择性阴茎栓塞术治疗动脉性阴茎异常勃起的可行性、益处及并发症。
通过对我院放射信息系统进行关键词检索,确定了4例在4年期间因动脉性阴茎异常勃起(高流量型阴茎异常勃起)接受阴茎血管造影的连续患者,年龄分别为28岁、29岁、40岁和49岁。1例患者有阴茎直接外伤史(勃起阴茎受到严重撞击),3例患者患有复发性自发性阴茎异常勃起。所有患者此前均接受过海绵体穿刺抽吸及去甲肾上腺素注射以促进消肿。2例患者曾进行过1次或多次海绵体分流手术但未成功。
4例患者中的3例,超选择性阴部内动脉及阴茎血管造影显示存在病理性动静脉分流。在这3例患者中的2例,尝试使用同轴微导管进行超选择性栓塞。在其中1例患者中,在实际注入栓塞材料之前海绵体动脉发生痉挛,导致阴茎立即且持久消肿。在另1例患者中,单侧明胶海绵栓塞导致阴茎立即消肿,但术后12小时阴茎异常勃起复发。随后进行的对侧明胶海绵栓塞成功。所有病例勃起功能均得以保留。未发生与手术相关的并发症。
我们的经验支持当前文献中的普遍观点,即超选择性同轴栓塞术是高流量型阴茎异常勃起患者的首选治疗方法。预后良好,保留勃起功能的可能性很大。