Goldenberg Georg, Hartmann Karoline, Schlott Isa
Neuropsychological Department, Bogenhausen Hospital, Krankenhaus Munchen Bogenhausen, Englschalkingerstrasse 77, D 81925 Munich, Germany.
Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(12):1565-73. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(03)00120-9.
Disturbance of pantomime of object use in patients with left brain damage (LBD) and aphasia has been firmly established but its nature remains controversial. It may be due to an inability to perform movements from memory without external support by objects (apraxia) or to an inability to produce signs referring to absent objects and actions (asymbolia). The need to perform movements without external support is shared with imitation of gestures, and the demand to designate absent objects with drawing from memory. Both of these tasks have been found to be impaired in LBD. We examined pantomime of object use, drawing objects from memory, imitation of meaningless gestures, and aphasia in 40 patients with LBD and aphasia and compared them to healthy controls and to patients with right brain damage (RBD). Whereas drawing showed comparable sensitivity to LBD and RBD, pantomime was distinctly more disturbed in LBD than in RBD patients. Pantomime was worse than drawing in LBD but better than drawing in RBD. In the LBD group scores on pantomime showed significant correlations of very similar strength to drawing, imitation, and all language tests. Multidimensional scaling of the correlational structure placed pantomime in an intermediate position between verbal and non-verbal tests. We conclude that neither apraxia nor asymbolia can satisfactorily explain our results. It seems as if pantomime of object use taps a central aspect of left hemisphere function which is compromised by any LBD. We propose that this may be the ability to select and combine distinctive features of objects and actions.
左脑损伤(LBD)和失语症患者在物体使用模仿方面的障碍已被明确证实,但其本质仍存在争议。这可能是由于在没有物体外部支持的情况下无法根据记忆执行动作(失用症),或者是由于无法产生指代不存在物体和动作的符号(符号失用症)。在没有外部支持的情况下执行动作的需求与手势模仿相同,并且需要根据记忆画出不存在的物体。已发现这两项任务在LBD患者中均受损。我们检查了40例LBD和失语症患者的物体使用模仿、凭记忆画物体、无意义手势模仿和失语症情况,并将他们与健康对照组以及右脑损伤(RBD)患者进行了比较。虽然绘画对LBD和RBD的敏感性相当,但LBD患者的模仿明显比RBD患者更受干扰。在LBD中,模仿比绘画差,但在RBD中比绘画好。在LBD组中,模仿得分与绘画、模仿和所有语言测试的得分显示出非常相似强度的显著相关性。相关结构的多维标度分析将模仿置于言语和非言语测试之间的中间位置。我们得出结论,失用症和符号失用症都不能令人满意地解释我们的结果。似乎物体使用模仿触及了左半球功能的一个核心方面,而任何LBD都会损害这一方面。我们提出,这可能是选择和组合物体及动作独特特征的能力。