Suppr超能文献

两人比划比划就知道了:交流与运动认知的交汇。

It takes two to pantomime: Communication meets motor cognition.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany; Lurija Institute for Rehabilitation Science and Health Research, Kliniken Schmieder, Allensbach, Germany.

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany.

出版信息

Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Jun 21;19:1008-1017. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.06.019. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

For over a century, pantomime of tool use has been employed to diagnose limb apraxia, a disorder of motor cognition primarily induced by left brain damage. While research consistently implicates damage to a left fronto-temporo-parietal network in limb apraxia, findings are inconsistent regarding the impact of damage to anterior versus posterior nodes within this network on pantomime. Complicating matters is the fact that tool use pantomime can be affected and evaluated at multiple levels. For instance, the production of tool use gestures requires the consideration of semantic characteristics (e.g. how to communicate the action intention) as well as motor features (e.g. forming grip and movement). Together, these factors may contribute substantially to apparent discrepancies in previously reported findings regarding neural correlates of tool use pantomime. In the current study, 67 stroke patients with unilateral left-brain damage performed a classic pantomime task. In order to analyze different error characteristics, we evaluated the proper use of grip and movement for each pantomime. For certain objects, healthy subjects may use body parts as representative for the object, e.g. use of the fingers to indicate scissors blades. To specify the pathological use of body parts as the object (BPO) we only assessed pantomime items that were not prone to this response in healthy participants. We performed modern voxel-based lesion analyses on MRI or CT data to determine associations between brain injury and the frequency of the specific types of pantomime errors. Our results support a model in which anterior and posterior nodes of the left fronto-temporo-parietal network contribute differentially to pantomime of tool use. More precisely, damage in the inferior frontal cortex reaching to the temporal pole is associated with an increased frequency of BPO errors, whereas damage to the inferior parietal lobe is predominantly linked to an increased frequency of movement and/or grip errors. Our work suggests that the validity of attempts to specify the neural correlates of limb apraxia based on tool use pantomime depends on differentiating the specific types of errors committed. We conclude that successful tool use pantomime involves dissociable functions with communicative aspects represented in more anterior (rather ventral) regions and motor-cognitive aspects in more posterior (rather dorsal) nodes of a left fronto-temporo-parietal network.

摘要

一个多世纪以来,人们一直采用工具使用的模拟动作来诊断运动认知障碍中的上肢失用症,这种障碍主要由左脑损伤引起。虽然研究一致表明,左额颞顶叶网络的损伤与上肢失用症有关,但关于该网络中前后节点损伤对模拟动作的影响,研究结果并不一致。使问题复杂化的是,工具使用模拟动作可以在多个层面受到影响和评估。例如,制作工具使用手势需要考虑语义特征(例如如何传达动作意图)和运动特征(例如形成握持和运动)。这些因素加在一起,可能会导致先前关于工具使用模拟动作神经关联的报告中出现明显的差异。在目前的研究中,67 名单侧左脑损伤的中风患者进行了一项经典的模拟动作任务。为了分析不同的错误特征,我们评估了每种模拟动作的握持和运动的正确使用情况。对于某些物体,健康受试者可能会使用身体部位来代表物体,例如使用手指指示剪刀刀片。为了指定将身体部位作为物体的病理性使用(BPO),我们只评估了在健康参与者中不容易出现这种反应的模拟动作项目。我们对 MRI 或 CT 数据进行了现代基于体素的病变分析,以确定大脑损伤与特定类型的模拟动作错误频率之间的关联。我们的研究结果支持这样一种模型,即左额颞顶叶网络的前后节点对工具使用的模拟动作有不同的贡献。更准确地说,从额下回延伸到颞极的损伤与 BPO 错误频率增加有关,而顶下小叶的损伤主要与运动和/或握持错误频率增加有关。我们的研究工作表明,基于工具使用模拟动作来指定上肢失用症的神经关联的尝试的有效性取决于区分所犯的特定类型的错误。我们得出结论,成功的工具使用模拟动作涉及具有分离功能的动作,其交际方面由左额颞顶叶网络的更前(更腹侧)区域表示,而运动认知方面由更后的(更背侧)节点表示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8620/6039835/f498f57d614e/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验