Suppr超能文献

在人外周血单核细胞(PBMCs)中诱导先天性免疫反应的两种方法:通过病毒蛋白或双链RNA(dsRNA)旁分泌刺激干扰素-α(IFN-α)反应。

Two ways to induce innate immune responses in human PBMCs: paracrine stimulation of IFN-alpha responses by viral protein or dsRNA.

作者信息

Fournier Philippe, Zeng Jinyang, Schirrmacher Volker

机构信息

German Cancer Research Center, Division of Cellular Immunology (D010), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69121 Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Oncol. 2003 Sep;23(3):673-80.

Abstract

In order to study mechanisms of induction of IFN-alpha by Newcastle disease virus (NDV), we used two replicon systems which are based respectively on DNA and RNA of the Semliki forest virus (SFV) and transfected these into baby hamster kidney cells (BHK) which do not produce interferon-alpha. Co-incubation of BHK cells which were transfected with the two vector systems, with human PBMCs, showed that production of IFN-alpha takes place by two different ways. When using the DNA-based SFV vector, only transfectants expressing cell surface HN molecules of NDV (and not the mock-transfected cells) elicited such a response via interaction of these HN molecules with viral receptors on PBMCs. In contrast, BHK cells transfected with RNA which had been in vitro transcribed from the RNA-based SFV vector without foreign gene as insert (mock-transfected) elicited a comparable IFN-alpha response. Transfer by transfection of poly(I:C), an analogue of double stranded RNA (dsRNA), into the BHK cells induced also by itself the production of IFN-alpha. Therefore induction of "danger signals" (as double-strand RNA replicative intermediates) might be responsible for this discrepancy observed in IFN-alpha induction in PBMCs between the two studied SFV vector systems based on transfection of DNA and on RNA. These observations highlight two ways of IFN-alpha induction which additively may explain the high interferonogenic capacity of NDV as virus: i) via cell-surface expressed HN after transfection of the DNA-based SFV replicon and ii) via transfection of self-amplifying RNA.

摘要

为了研究新城疫病毒(NDV)诱导α干扰素的机制,我们使用了两种分别基于Semliki森林病毒(SFV)的DNA和RNA构建的复制子系统,并将它们转染到不产生α干扰素的幼仓鼠肾细胞(BHK)中。用这两种载体系统转染的BHK细胞与人外周血单个核细胞(PBMC)共同孵育,结果显示α干扰素的产生通过两种不同的方式进行。当使用基于DNA的SFV载体时,只有表达NDV细胞表面HN分子的转染细胞(而非 mock 转染细胞)通过这些HN分子与PBMC上病毒受体的相互作用引发这种反应。相反,用不含外源基因插入片段的基于RNA的SFV载体体外转录的RNA转染的BHK细胞(mock 转染)引发了类似的α干扰素反应。通过转染双链RNA(dsRNA)类似物聚肌胞苷酸(poly(I:C))到BHK细胞中,其自身也能诱导α干扰素的产生。因此,“危险信号”(如双链RNA复制中间体)的诱导可能是导致在基于DNA转染和RNA转染的两种研究的SFV载体系统中PBMC中α干扰素诱导出现这种差异的原因。这些观察结果突出了α干扰素诱导的两种方式,它们相加可能解释了NDV作为病毒的高干扰素生成能力:i)基于DNA的SFV复制子转染后通过细胞表面表达的HN诱导,ii)通过自我扩增RNA的转染诱导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验