D'Amico D, Grazzi L, Usai S, Andrasik F, Leone M, Rigamonti A, Bussone G
Headache Center, C. Besta National Neurological Institute, Via Celoria 11, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Headache. 2003 Jul-Aug;43(7):767-73. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2003.03134.x.
To determine the suitability of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire for assessing disability in children and adolescents with headache and to obtain preliminary information about disability in different primary headaches.
During the last decade, researchers have begun to employ standardized methodologies to investigate the global impact of primary headaches. Disease-specific instruments have been developed to measure headache-related disability. The MIDAS Questionnaire, which is the most extensively studied of these instruments, was designed to assess the overall impact of headaches over the 3 months before compilation. The MIDAS Questionnaire is an optimal tool to assess headache-related disability in adults.
Ninety-five patients aged 7 to 17 years with tension-type headache, migraine, or both completed the validated Italian form of the MIDAS questionnaire on 2 occasions. Test-retest reliability was assessed by the Spearman rank correlation test. The Cronbach alpha assessed internal consistency. The patients answered questions about the adequacy of the questionnaire.
The Cronbach alpha was.8. Correlation coefficients were generally high for the overall MIDAS score and for the items investigating disability in school and in family/leisure activities; they were lower for the items about housework. Most patients thought that the MIDAS Questionnaire was useful (98.9%) and that it captured the impact of their headaches (58.9%); 41% thought that questions about disability in housework were useless, 44.2% suggested adding questions regarding inability to do homework. All primary headaches had a considerable impact on daily activities, but patients with migraine tended to have lower headache frequencies and lower total disability time; those with tension-type headache suffered more days in which activities, although performed, were substantially impaired.
The MIDAS Questionnaire is useful for assessing disability in children and adolescents with different primary headaches. Minimal changes in the phrasing and content of the items would be sufficient to render the MIDAS specific for the younger population with headache.
确定偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS)问卷对于评估儿童和青少年头痛患者残疾情况的适用性,并获取不同原发性头痛患者残疾情况的初步信息。
在过去十年中,研究人员已开始采用标准化方法来调查原发性头痛的总体影响。已开发出针对特定疾病的工具来测量与头痛相关的残疾情况。MIDAS问卷是这些工具中研究最为广泛的,旨在评估编制前3个月内头痛的总体影响。MIDAS问卷是评估成人头痛相关残疾的最佳工具。
95名年龄在7至17岁之间患有紧张型头痛、偏头痛或两者皆有的患者分两次完成了经过验证的意大利语版MIDAS问卷。通过Spearman等级相关检验评估重测信度。用Cronbach α系数评估内部一致性。患者回答有关问卷是否合适的问题。
Cronbach α系数为0.8。总体MIDAS评分以及调查学校和家庭/休闲活动中残疾情况的项目的相关系数普遍较高;关于家务的项目相关系数较低。大多数患者认为MIDAS问卷有用(98.9%),且能反映他们头痛的影响(58.9%);41%的患者认为有关家务残疾情况的问题无用,44.2%的患者建议增加关于无法做作业的问题。所有原发性头痛对日常活动都有相当大的影响,但偏头痛患者的头痛频率往往较低,总残疾时间也较短;紧张型头痛患者在虽进行但受到严重影响的活动天数更多。
MIDAS问卷对于评估患有不同原发性头痛的儿童和青少年的残疾情况有用。对问卷项目的措辞和内容进行最小程度的修改就足以使MIDAS适用于更年轻的头痛患者群体。