Kodityal Sandeep, Manhas Amit H, Udden Mark, Rice Lawrence
The Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Eur J Haematol. 2003 Aug;71(2):109-13. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2003.00105.x.
Patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) (with or without thrombosis) require alternative anticoagulation because of their extreme risk of new thromboembolic complications. The first effective agent for this purpose may be danaparoid, a less-sulfated low molecular weight heparinoid. Recently, direct thrombin inhibitors have been used.
Five HIT patients, who developed new thromboembolic complications while receiving danaparoid, were analyzed to consider possible reasons for treatment failure and to promulgate strategies that improve efficacy.
Three patients had acute HIT, one had recent HIT, and one with remote HIT was re-exposed to heparin during heart surgery. Danaparoid was started as intravenous bolus and infusion in one patient, and as 1250 units subcutaneously twice daily in four patients. The new complications that emerged on danaparoid were new venous thrombi in three patients (one with pulmonary emboli), lower extremity arterial thrombosis in one, myocardial ischemia in one, thromboembolic cardiovascular accidents in one, and fatal bowel necrosis in one (two patients suffered more than one complication). Platelet counts did not improve or worsened in four, improved partially in the other, and parameters of disseminated intravascular coagulation failed to improve in one patient. Four patients responded relatively dramatically when direct thrombin inhibitors were substituted. Possible reasons for danaparoid failure include that: 1) no treatment is expected to completely prevent complications, 2) antithrombin III consumption can blunt efficacy in some patients, 3) low or intermediate doses may be insufficient, and 4) there was clinically significant cross-reactivity of the pathogenic HIT antibodies.
It is emphasized that the possibility of clinically significant antibody cross-reactivity and that low or intermediate dosage may be inadequate when using danaparoid in therapy of HIT. The latter problem probably extrapolates to other anticoagulants used for HIT.
肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)患者(无论有无血栓形成)因有发生新的血栓栓塞并发症的极高风险,需要采用替代抗凝治疗。用于此目的的首个有效药物可能是达那肝素,一种硫酸化程度较低的低分子肝素类似物。近来,直接凝血酶抑制剂也已开始应用。
分析5例在接受达那肝素治疗时发生新的血栓栓塞并发症的HIT患者,以探讨治疗失败的可能原因并提出提高疗效的策略。
3例为急性HIT,1例为近期HIT,1例既往有HIT的患者在心脏手术期间再次接触肝素。1例患者开始时静脉推注并输注达那肝素,4例患者开始时皮下注射1250单位,每日2次。使用达那肝素期间出现的新并发症包括:3例患者出现新的静脉血栓(1例伴有肺栓塞),1例下肢动脉血栓形成,1例心肌缺血,1例血栓栓塞性心血管意外,1例致命性肠坏死(2例患者出现不止一种并发症)。4例患者的血小板计数未改善或恶化,另1例部分改善,1例患者的弥散性血管内凝血指标未改善。4例患者换用直接凝血酶抑制剂后反应相对显著。达那肝素治疗失败的可能原因包括:1)没有一种治疗方法能完全预防并发症;2)抗凝血酶III消耗可能削弱某些患者的疗效;3)低剂量或中等剂量可能不足;4)致病性HIT抗体存在临床上显著的交叉反应性。
强调在HIT治疗中使用达那肝素时,临床上显著的抗体交叉反应性以及低剂量或中等剂量可能不足的可能性。后一个问题可能也适用于用于HIT的其他抗凝剂。