• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

切割球囊血管成形术治疗弥漫性支架内再狭窄的疗效

The impact of cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis.

作者信息

Iijima Raisuke, Ikari Yuji, Anzai Hitoshi, Nishida Takahiro, Tsunoda Taro, Nakamura Masato, Hara Kazuhiro, Yamaguchi Tetsu

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, 1 Kanda-Izumicho Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-8643, Japan.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2003 Aug;15(8):427-31.

PMID:12890868
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the comparable safety and efficacy of cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) and balloon angioplasty (BA) for diffuse in-stent restenosis (ISR).

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have found that diffuse-type ISR predicts recurrence of ISR. The efficacy of CBA in this clinical setting is incompletely documented.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One-hundred and seven consecutive diffuse ISR lesions (length > 10 mm) in 104 patients treated by CBA or BA were retrospectively analyzed. CBA was used in 61 lesions and BA in 46 lesions. Initial success (residual restenosis 30% with no major complications) was achieved in 99% of cases in each group. Follow-up angiography was performed in all patients at 131 93 days. Although the percent diameter stenosis after CBA was lower than after BA (19 12% versus 27 12%; p = 0.001), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or other QCA data were similar in the 2 groups. In follow-up angiography, recurrent restenosis rate was not statistically different between CBA (34%) and BA (52%); however, recurrent diffuse ISR was lower in the CBA group (20%) than the BA group (48%; p = 0.01). Lesion length at follow-up in the CBA group was smaller compared to the BA group (15.9 7.3 mm versus 24.2 14.4 mm; p < 0.05), while lesion length before procedure was similar.

CONCLUSION

CBA for ISR is safe and effective with favorable long-term outcomes. This effect is mainly due to shortening lesion length.

摘要

目的

确定切割球囊血管成形术(CBA)与球囊血管成形术(BA)治疗弥漫性支架内再狭窄(ISR)的安全性和疗效的可比性。

背景

既往研究发现弥漫型ISR预示着ISR的复发。CBA在这种临床情况下的疗效记录不完整。

方法与结果

回顾性分析104例接受CBA或BA治疗的患者中连续的107处弥漫性ISR病变(长度>10mm)。61处病变采用CBA,46处病变采用BA。每组99%的病例取得了初始成功(残余再狭窄<30%且无重大并发症)。所有患者在131±93天进行了随访血管造影。虽然CBA术后直径狭窄百分比低于BA(19±12%对27±12%;p = 0.001),但两组的血管内超声(IVUS)或其他定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)数据相似。在随访血管造影中,CBA组(34%)和BA组(52%)的再狭窄复发率无统计学差异;然而,CBA组的弥漫性ISR复发率(20%)低于BA组(48%;p = 0.01)。与BA组相比,CBA组随访时的病变长度更小(15.9±7.3mm对24.2±14.4mm;p<0.05),而术前病变长度相似。

结论

CBA治疗ISR安全有效,长期预后良好。这种效果主要是由于病变长度缩短。

相似文献

1
The impact of cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis.切割球囊血管成形术治疗弥漫性支架内再狭窄的疗效
J Invasive Cardiol. 2003 Aug;15(8):427-31.
2
Cutting balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: results of the restenosis cutting balloon evaluation trial (RESCUT).切割球囊与传统球囊血管成形术治疗支架内再狭窄:再狭窄切割球囊评估试验(RESCUT)的结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Mar 17;43(6):943-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.054.
3
Standalone cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of stent-related restenosis: acute results and 3- to 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rates.单纯切割球囊血管成形术治疗支架相关再狭窄:急性结果及3至6个月血管造影再狭窄复发率
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001 Nov;54(3):301-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1288.
4
FX minirail balloon angioplasty for the treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis: a matched comparison of 6 months' outcome with conventional balloon angioplasty.FX 微导管球囊血管成形术治疗支架内再狭窄患者:与传统球囊血管成形术6个月疗效的匹配对照研究
Heart Vessels. 2004 Sep;19(5):230-6. doi: 10.1007/s00380-004-0773-9.
5
Differences in optical coherence tomographic findings and clinical outcomes between excimer laser and cutting balloon angioplasty for focal in-stent restenosis lesions.准分子激光与切割球囊血管成形术治疗局灶性支架内再狭窄病变的光学相干断层扫描结果及临床结局差异。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Oct;24(10):478-83.
6
Intracoronary 166Holmium brachytherapy combined with cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis.冠状动脉内166钬近距离放射疗法联合切割球囊血管成形术治疗支架内再狭窄。
Cardiovasc Radiat Med. 2003 Jul-Sep;4(3):119-25. doi: 10.1016/S1522-1865(03)00181-1.
7
A quantitative coronary angiography-matched comparison between a prospective randomised multicentre cutting balloon angioplasty and bare metal stent trial (REDUCE III) and the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluation At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) study.前瞻性随机多中心切割球囊血管成形术与金属裸支架试验(REDUCE III)和雷帕霉素洗脱支架评估在鹿特丹心脏病学医院(RESEARCH)研究的定量冠状动脉造影匹配比较。
EuroIntervention. 2010 Aug;6(3):400-6. doi: 10.4244/EIJV6I3A66.
8
Cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis in diabetics: A matched comparison of 6 months' outcome with conventional balloon angioplasty.切割球囊血管成形术治疗糖尿病患者支架内再狭窄:与传统球囊血管成形术6个月结果的配对比较。
Angiology. 2006 Aug-Sep;57(4):445-52. doi: 10.1177/0003319706290619.
9
A multicenter randomized comparison of paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter with conventional balloon angioplasty in patients with bare-metal stent restenosis and drug-eluting stent restenosis.紫杉醇涂层球囊导管与常规球囊血管成形术治疗金属裸支架再狭窄和药物洗脱支架再狭窄患者的多中心随机比较。
Am Heart J. 2013 Sep;166(3):527-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
10
Cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: a matched comparison with rotational atherectomy, additional stent implantation and balloon angioplasty.切割球囊血管成形术治疗支架内再狭窄:与旋磨术、再次支架植入术及球囊血管成形术的配对比较
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Sep;38(3):672-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01458-9.