Comparison of three-year clinical outcome of the multi-link stent with the Palmaz-Schatz stent in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease: a case control study.

Results of trials using the ACS Multi-Link (ML) stent, one of the new generation stents, were similar to or slightly better than those of trials using the Palmaz-Schatz (PS) stent. The purpose of this study was to compare long-term (3-year) clinical outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease treated with the ML stent to those treated with the PS stent. The present study consisted of 52 patients who underwent successful coronary ML stent implantation (ML group) and 52 matched control patients who underwent successful coronary PS stent implantation (PS group) from October 1997 to September 1999. During follow-up periods, cardiac events occurred in 11 patients (21%) in the ML group and 14 patients (27%) in the PS group, respectively (p = NS). Angiographic restenosis rates of American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) lesion type A or B1 were 8.3% in both groups, and ACC/AHA lesion type B2 or C were 39.3% in the ML group and 35.7% in the PS group, respectively (p = NS). In addition, angiographic restenosis rates of ACC/AHA lesion type A or B1 were significantly lower than those of lesion type B2 or C in both groups. The results of the present study suggest that 6-month angiographic and 3-year clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease treated by coronary stenting with the ML stent were comparable to those with the PS stent.