du Toit Daniel F, van Schalkwyk Gerrit D, Wadee Shabbir A, Warren Brian L
Department of Surgery, Tygerberg Hospital, PO Box 19063, Tygerberg 7505, South Africa.
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Aug;38(2):257-62. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00143-5.
We undertook this study to determine factors that adversely affect outcome in patients with penetrating injury to the extracranial cerebral vasculature. Patients and methods Medical records were reviewed for all patients who had undergone surgical intervention to treat penetrating injury to the extracranial cerebral arteries between January 1989 and December 1999. Forensic autopsy findings were also reviewed for all patients who died as a result of their injury.
One hundred fifty-one patients with injury to the brachiocephalic artery (n = 21), common carotid artery (n = 98), or internal carotid artery (n = 32) were identified. Overall mortality was 21.2%, and stroke rate in surviving patients was 15.1%. Twenty-five of 32 deaths (78.1%) were stroke-related. Brachiocephalic artery injury was associated with the highest mortality (38.1%), and survivor stroke rate was highest in patients with internal carotid injuries (22.7%). Hemodynamic instability at presentation led to both higher mortality (30.7%) and stroke rate (19.2%). Preoperative angiography did not influence mortality or stroke rate in hemodynamically stable patients. Procedural mortality associated with arterial ligation was 45% (9 of 20 patients), and no surviving patient experienced a change in pre-ligation neurologic state. Nine patients remained neurologically intact after ligation, and 2 patients with preoperative localized neurologic deficit were unchanged postoperatively. In 131 patients, mortality after arterial repair was 17.6%, and in 5 surviving patients (5.4%) an ischemic neurologic deficit developed. Twelve of 15 surviving patients (80%) with preoperative neurologic deficit who underwent arterial repair had improved neurologic status. Cerebral infarcts were confirmed at autopsy in 23 patients; 18 infarcts were ischemic (10, repair; 8, ligation), and 5 infarcts were hemorrhagic (all, repair). No factor was identified that was predictive of ischemic versus hemorrhagic infarction in patients undergoing repair.
The presence of hypovolemic shock, internal carotid artery injury, complete vessel transection, and arterial ligation are associated with unfavorable outcome. Penetrating injury to the brachiocephalic, common carotid, or internal carotid artery should be repaired rather than ligated when technically possible. Subsequent ischemic or hemorrhagic cerebral infarction is unpredictable, but overall outcome is superior to that with ligation of the injured artery.
我们开展这项研究以确定对颅外脑血管穿透伤患者预后产生不利影响的因素。患者与方法 回顾了1989年1月至1999年12月期间所有接受手术治疗颅外脑动脉穿透伤患者的病历。还回顾了所有因伤死亡患者的法医尸检结果。
共确定了151例头臂动脉(n = 21)、颈总动脉(n = 98)或颈内动脉(n = 32)损伤的患者。总体死亡率为21.2%,存活患者的卒中发生率为15.1%。32例死亡患者中有25例(78.1%)与卒中相关。头臂动脉损伤的死亡率最高(38.1%),颈内动脉损伤患者的存活者卒中发生率最高(22.7%)。就诊时血流动力学不稳定导致更高的死亡率(30.7%)和卒中发生率(19.2%)。术前血管造影对血流动力学稳定患者的死亡率或卒中发生率没有影响。与动脉结扎相关的手术死亡率为45%(20例患者中的9例),且没有存活患者在结扎前的神经状态发生改变。9例患者结扎后神经功能保持完整,2例术前有局限性神经功能缺损的患者术后无变化。131例患者动脉修复后的死亡率为17.6%,5例存活患者(5.4%)出现缺血性神经功能缺损。15例术前有神经功能缺损且接受动脉修复的存活患者中有12例(80%)神经状态改善。尸检确诊23例患者发生脑梗死;18例梗死为缺血性(10例为修复后,8例为结扎后),5例梗死为出血性(均为修复后)。在接受修复的患者中,未发现可预测缺血性梗死与出血性梗死的因素。
存在低血容量性休克、颈内动脉损伤、血管完全横断和动脉结扎与不良预后相关。当头臂动脉、颈总动脉或颈内动脉发生穿透伤时,在技术可行的情况下应进行修复而非结扎。随后发生的缺血性或出血性脑梗死无法预测,但总体预后优于结扎受伤动脉。