Liekweg W G, Greenfield L J
Ann Surg. 1978 Nov;188(5):587-92. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197811000-00001.
A review of the experience with penetrating wounds to the carotid artery was undertaken in an effort to establish concise clinical criteria for surgical management. These results were compared with similar cases from the literature reported since 1963. In these 233 cases, the presence or absence of preoperative neurological deficits was correlated with vascular repair or ligation of the carotid artery. The presence of coma preoperatively was the single most influential factor in determining operative management and prognosis. Patients without a neurological defect should have restoration of vascular continuity (0% mortality, 0.6% morbidity), which produces significantly better results than carotid ligation (p less than 0.002). Patients with all grades of neurological deficit, short of coma, should also have primary vascular repair. Morbidity and mortality rates are significantly less than those following ligation (15 vs. 50%, p less than 0.05). In comatose patients, neither repair nor ligation appear to influence the poor prognosis. At the present time, ligation of the carotid artery is only indicated in the comatose patient who has no evidence of prograde flow or if repair is technically impossible.
为了制定简明的手术治疗临床标准,我们对颈动脉穿透伤的治疗经验进行了回顾。将这些结果与1963年以来文献报道的类似病例进行了比较。在这233例病例中,术前有无神经功能缺损与颈动脉血管修复或结扎相关。术前昏迷是决定手术治疗和预后的唯一最有影响的因素。无神经功能缺损的患者应恢复血管连续性(死亡率0%,发病率0.6%),其效果明显优于颈动脉结扎术(p<0.002)。所有程度的神经功能缺损但未昏迷的患者也应进行一期血管修复。其发病率和死亡率明显低于结扎术后(分别为15%和50%,p<0.05)。对于昏迷患者,修复或结扎似乎均不影响其不良预后。目前,颈动脉结扎仅适用于无顺行血流证据的昏迷患者或技术上无法进行修复的情况。