Suppr超能文献

穿透性颈动脉损伤的处理

Management of penetrating carotid arterial injury.

作者信息

Liekweg W G, Greenfield L J

出版信息

Ann Surg. 1978 Nov;188(5):587-92. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197811000-00001.

Abstract

A review of the experience with penetrating wounds to the carotid artery was undertaken in an effort to establish concise clinical criteria for surgical management. These results were compared with similar cases from the literature reported since 1963. In these 233 cases, the presence or absence of preoperative neurological deficits was correlated with vascular repair or ligation of the carotid artery. The presence of coma preoperatively was the single most influential factor in determining operative management and prognosis. Patients without a neurological defect should have restoration of vascular continuity (0% mortality, 0.6% morbidity), which produces significantly better results than carotid ligation (p less than 0.002). Patients with all grades of neurological deficit, short of coma, should also have primary vascular repair. Morbidity and mortality rates are significantly less than those following ligation (15 vs. 50%, p less than 0.05). In comatose patients, neither repair nor ligation appear to influence the poor prognosis. At the present time, ligation of the carotid artery is only indicated in the comatose patient who has no evidence of prograde flow or if repair is technically impossible.

摘要

为了制定简明的手术治疗临床标准,我们对颈动脉穿透伤的治疗经验进行了回顾。将这些结果与1963年以来文献报道的类似病例进行了比较。在这233例病例中,术前有无神经功能缺损与颈动脉血管修复或结扎相关。术前昏迷是决定手术治疗和预后的唯一最有影响的因素。无神经功能缺损的患者应恢复血管连续性(死亡率0%,发病率0.6%),其效果明显优于颈动脉结扎术(p<0.002)。所有程度的神经功能缺损但未昏迷的患者也应进行一期血管修复。其发病率和死亡率明显低于结扎术后(分别为15%和50%,p<0.05)。对于昏迷患者,修复或结扎似乎均不影响其不良预后。目前,颈动脉结扎仅适用于无顺行血流证据的昏迷患者或技术上无法进行修复的情况。

相似文献

1
Management of penetrating carotid arterial injury.穿透性颈动脉损伤的处理
Ann Surg. 1978 Nov;188(5):587-92. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197811000-00001.
2
Carotid artery injuries.颈动脉损伤。
Am J Surg. 1982 Dec;144(6):748-53. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(82)90563-3.
7
Carotid artery injuries and their management.颈动脉损伤及其处理
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2000 Jun;41(3):423-31.

引用本文的文献

2
Damage control in penetrating carotid artery trauma: changing a 100-year paradigm.穿透性颈动脉创伤的损伤控制:改变一个百年范式。
Colomb Med (Cali). 2021 Jun 30;52(2):e4054807. doi: 10.25100/cm.v52i2.4807. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
4
Delayed presentation of a carotid pseudoaneurysm following penetrating neck trauma.颈部穿透伤后颈动脉假性动脉瘤的延迟表现。
SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2016 May 11;4:2050313X16649132. doi: 10.1177/2050313X16649132. eCollection 2016.
5
Penetrating carotid artery: uncommon complex and lethal injuries.穿透性颈动脉损伤:罕见的复杂致命伤。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2011 Oct;37(5):429. doi: 10.1007/s00068-011-0132-3. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
8
Endovascular treatment of an open cervical fracture with carotid artery tear.开放性颈椎骨折合并颈动脉撕裂的血管内治疗
Eur Spine J. 2006 Oct;15 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):650-2. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0182-0. Epub 2006 Jul 21.
10
Carotid artery injuries caused by blunt trauma.钝性创伤所致的颈动脉损伤。
Ann Surg. 1980 Jul;192(1):74-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198007000-00013.

本文引用的文献

6
Carotid artery injuries. An analysis of eighty-five cases.颈动脉损伤。85例病例分析。
Am J Surg. 1970 Aug;120(2):210-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(70)80113-1.
8
Carotid vertebral trauma.颈动脉椎动脉创伤。
J Trauma. 1969 Dec;9(12):987-99. doi: 10.1097/00005373-196912000-00003.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验