Lancaster D L, Hoddes J A, Michalski A
Department of Paediatrics, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
J Neurooncol. 2003 Jul;63(3):289-94. doi: 10.1023/a:1024278925822.
The aim of this study was to compare tolerance of a nitrosurea-based regime with 'standard' therapy of vincristine (VCR) and carboplatin for low-grade gliomas. Ten children with low-grade gliomas received second line therapy consisting of thioguanine, procarbazine, CCNU and vincristine (TPCV). Two groups were identified, i.e. patients who had either experienced significant toxicity with carboplatin (reaction group) or had re-growth of their tumor (re-growth group) following first line therapy. Patients were evaluated for toxicity. Data was available on nine patients. Patients in the reaction group completed a mean of 3 cycles of TPCV (range 2-4). One patient stopped after 2 cycles of TPCV due to tumor progression and died 3 months later and one remained on therapy at the time of analysis. Patients in the re-growth group received a mean of 5.5 cycles of TPCV (range 4-8). Treatment was discontinued in one patient after 4 cycles due to hematological toxicity, one experienced tumor progression after 4 cycles and one stopped after 6 cycles because of neurological toxicity. There was no difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, transfusion requirements or delays in chemotherapy between TPCV and VCR/carboplatin in either group. There were no serious infections or toxic deaths. Seven of nine patients had stable disease at a mean of 13 months of follow up. TPCV therapy is a well-tolerated regime with comparable bone marrow toxicity to VCR/carboplatin. Significant disease stabilization was observed with TPCV and hence this regime may be used as second line therapy.
本研究的目的是比较基于亚硝基脲的治疗方案与长春新碱(VCR)和卡铂的“标准”疗法对低级别胶质瘤的耐受性。10名患有低级别胶质瘤的儿童接受了由硫鸟嘌呤、丙卡巴肼、洛莫司汀(CCNU)和长春新碱(TPCV)组成的二线治疗。确定了两组,即一线治疗后对卡铂有明显毒性反应的患者(反应组)或肿瘤复发的患者(复发组)。对患者的毒性进行了评估。有9名患者的数据可用。反应组患者平均完成了3个周期的TPCV治疗(范围为2 - 4个周期)。1名患者在2个周期的TPCV治疗后因肿瘤进展停止治疗,3个月后死亡,1名患者在分析时仍在接受治疗。复发组患者平均接受了5.5个周期的TPCV治疗(范围为4 - 8个周期)。1名患者在4个周期后因血液学毒性停止治疗,1名患者在4个周期后出现肿瘤进展,1名患者在6个周期后因神经毒性停止治疗。两组中,TPCV与VCR/卡铂相比,3/4级中性粒细胞减少或血小板减少的发生率、输血需求或化疗延迟方面均无差异。没有严重感染或毒性死亡情况。9名患者中有7名在平均13个月的随访中病情稳定。TPCV治疗是一种耐受性良好的方案,其骨髓毒性与VCR/卡铂相当。观察到TPCV能使疾病显著稳定,因此该方案可作为二线治疗。