Suppr超能文献

哪种伤口组织黏合剂?

Which tissue adhesive for wounds?

作者信息

Doraiswamy N V, Baig H, Hammett S, Hutton M

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Accident and Emergency, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Yorkhill, G3 8SJ, Scotland, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Injury. 2003 Aug;34(8):564-7. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(02)00210-3.

Abstract

We studied the three available tissue adhesives comparing their ease of technique, wound healing, satisfaction, merits and complications when treating childhood lacerations. Children presenting with uncomplicated wounds <2.5cm and <6h since the injury were studied. There were 17 children in each group. Results were compared for the individual tissue adhesive and the technique-contact and non-contact. The application was considered pain free in 82% of the non-contact technique and 56% for the contact technique-pain in 18 and 44%, respectively (P=0.062). Parents were satisfied in 88 and 94% for the contact and non-contact techniques, respectively (P=0.505) and the authors in 76 and 94% (P=0.119). The glove stuck to the wound in nine instances and was damaged once while breaking the container. The scab persisted in all scalp applications for 9-25 days. The adhesive effect was similar in all three. Indermil was considered to be the best among the three. Non-contact, droplet instillation (rather than contact application as was suggested for Dermabond and Histoacryl) was felt more comfortable.

摘要

我们研究了三种现有的组织粘合剂,比较了它们在治疗儿童撕裂伤时的操作简便性、伤口愈合情况、满意度、优点及并发症。研究对象为受伤后伤口不复杂、长度小于2.5厘米且受伤时间小于6小时的儿童。每组有17名儿童。对每种组织粘合剂以及接触式和非接触式技术的结果进行了比较。非接触式技术中82%的应用被认为无痛,接触式技术中这一比例为56%,分别有18%和44%的应用有疼痛(P = 0.062)。接触式和非接触式技术中家长的满意度分别为88%和94%(P = 0.505),作者的满意度分别为76%和94%(P = 0.119)。有9次手套粘在伤口上,打破容器时有1次手套受损。所有头皮应用中结痂持续9至25天。三种粘合剂的粘合效果相似。Indermil被认为是三者中最好的。非接触式滴注(而非如Dermabond和Histoacryl所建议的接触式应用)感觉更舒适。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验