Romero P, Frongia G, Wingerter S, Holland-Cunz S
Department of Surgery, Section Pediatric Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2011 May;21(3):159-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1270458. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
4 methods are used in pediatric laparoscopic surgery to close trocar wounds. While tissue adhesives or adhesive strips have been shown to produce fewer wound complications and a better cosmetic result compared to trans- or only subcutaneous sutures, the choice of technique is still often based on the surgeon's personal experience. Thus, the objective of this trial was to assess the impact of tissue adhesives (Dermabond™) compared to adhesive strips (Steri-Strip™) on potential complications of wound healing, wound pain, cosmetic outcome, and patient satisfaction after laparoscopic appendectomy in children.
49 patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy were enrolled in this prospective randomized trial. In every patient, two 5-mm and one 10-mm port-site incision was closed either with Dermabond™ or Steri-Strip™ after placing subcuticular absorbable sutures (4-0 Vicryl™). Postoperative complications, pain, and patient satisfaction with scars were evaluated at follow-up on day 10 and day 90 after the operation using a questionnaire and a visual analogue scale (VAS). Photographs of scars taken on day 90 were evaluated on a VAS by 2 pediatric surgeons blinded to the closure method used.
According to the surgeons' evaluation of the cosmetic outcome, a significant difference between the 2 groups with regard to the cosmetic score was found on day 90 of follow-up, favoring Steri-Strip™ wound closure (p < 0.05). On day 10 and 90 there were no statistical differences between the 2 methods as regards the result of patient evaluations (p > 0.05). Only one wound infection (4%) was observed in the Steri-Strip™ group (n = 25) on day 10. At follow-up on day 90 two patients (9.1%) in the Dermabond™ group and one (4.8%) in the Steri-strip™ group complained of wound pain (p = 0.52).
Both tissue adhesives and adhesive strips are excellent "no needle" alternatives for the closure of laparoscopic port-site incisions in children. As regards cosmetic outcome, Steri-Strip™ wound closure seems to be the most suitable and is also the less expensive technique.
小儿腹腔镜手术中使用4种方法闭合套管针伤口。虽然与经皮或仅皮下缝合相比,组织粘合剂或粘合带已显示出产生的伤口并发症更少且美容效果更好,但技术的选择仍常常基于外科医生的个人经验。因此,本试验的目的是评估组织粘合剂(皮肤粘合剂™)与粘合带(无菌创可贴™)相比,对儿童腹腔镜阑尾切除术后伤口愈合的潜在并发症、伤口疼痛、美容效果和患者满意度的影响。
49例行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的患者纳入了这项前瞻性随机试验。在每位患者中,在放置皮下可吸收缝线(4-0薇乔™)后,两个5毫米和一个10毫米的切口用皮肤粘合剂™或无菌创可贴™闭合。术后10天和90天随访时,使用问卷和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估术后并发症、疼痛及患者对疤痕的满意度。由2名对所用闭合方法不知情的小儿外科医生根据VAS对术后90天拍摄的疤痕照片进行评估。
根据外科医生对美容效果的评估,随访第90天时,两组在美容评分方面存在显著差异,无菌创可贴™伤口闭合更具优势(p<0.05)。在第10天和第90天,两种方法在患者评估结果方面无统计学差异(p>0.05)。第10天,无菌创可贴™组(n=25)仅观察到1例伤口感染(4%)。在第90天随访时,皮肤粘合剂™组有2例患者(9.1%)和无菌创可贴™组有1例患者(4.8%)主诉伤口疼痛(p=0.52)。
组织粘合剂和粘合带都是闭合小儿腹腔镜切口的优秀“无针”替代方法。就美容效果而言,无菌创可贴™伤口闭合似乎是最合适的,也是成本较低的技术。