• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A comparative study of imipenem versus piperacillin plus gentamicin in the initial management of febrile neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies.

作者信息

Leyland M J, Bayston K F, Cohen J, Warren R, Newland A C, Bint A J, Cefai C, White D G, Murray S A, Bareford D

机构信息

Department of Haematology, East Birmingham Hospital, UK.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1992 Dec;30(6):843-54. doi: 10.1093/jac/30.6.843.

DOI:10.1093/jac/30.6.843
PMID:1289359
Abstract

Three-hundred and twelve episodes of fever in 234 neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies were treated empirically with either imipenem or a combination of piperacillin and gentamicin. There were no significant differences in the percentages of patients responding to therapy at either 72 h (59% and 56% of assessable episodes in the imipenem and combination groups respectively) or at the end of treatment (55% and 53% of assessable episodes in the imipenem and combination groups respectively). Patients in the piperacillin plus gentamicin group experienced significantly more renal tubular damage whereas those who received imipenem suffered more nausea or vomiting. We conclude that imipenem monotherapy represents an acceptable alternative to piperacillin plus gentamicin as empirical therapy of the febrile neutropenic patient.

摘要

相似文献

1
A comparative study of imipenem versus piperacillin plus gentamicin in the initial management of febrile neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1992 Dec;30(6):843-54. doi: 10.1093/jac/30.6.843.
2
Piperacillin/tazobactam plus gentamicin as empirical therapy for febrile neutropenic patients with haematological malignancy.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦联合庆大霉素作为血液系统恶性肿瘤发热性中性粒细胞减少患者的经验性治疗方案。
J Chemother. 1992 Oct;4(5):281-5. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.1992.11739178.
3
Ciprofloxacin plus piperacillin compared with tobramycin plus piperacillin as empirical therapy in febrile neutropenic patients. A randomized, double-blind trial.环丙沙星联合哌拉西林与妥布霉素联合哌拉西林作为发热性中性粒细胞减少患者经验性治疗的比较。一项随机双盲试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jul 16;137(2):77-87. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-2-200207160-00005.
4
[Comparative study of piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin in febrile neutropenia (1994-1996)].哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗发热性中性粒细胞减少症的对比研究(1994 - 1996年)
Med Clin (Barc). 2001 May 5;116(16):610-1. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(01)71921-5.
5
[Aztreonam or gentamicin combined with piperacillin as empiric antibiotic therapy during neutropenia of patients with hematologic diseases].[氨曲南或庆大霉素联合哌拉西林作为血液系统疾病患者中性粒细胞减少期的经验性抗生素治疗]
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1992 Feb;66(2):121-6. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.66.121.
6
Piperacillin, beta-lactam inhibitor plus gentamicin as empirical therapy of a sequential regimen in febrile neutropenia of pediatric cancer patients.哌拉西林、β-内酰胺酶抑制剂加庆大霉素作为小儿癌症患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症序贯治疗方案的经验性治疗。
Support Care Cancer. 2001 Jul;9(5):372-9. doi: 10.1007/s005200000225.
7
Piperacillin-tazobactam is more effective than ceftriaxone plus gentamicin in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies: a randomized comparison.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦在血液系统恶性肿瘤发热性中性粒细胞减少患者中比头孢曲松加庆大霉素更有效:一项随机对照比较。
Support Care Cancer. 2003 Jun;11(6):362-70. doi: 10.1007/s00520-003-0463-7. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
8
A randomized study of teicoplanin plus ciprofloxacin versus gentamicin plus piperacillin for the empirical treatment of fever in neutropenic patients.
Br J Haematol. 1990 Dec;76 Suppl 2:10-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1990.tb07928.x.
9
Imipenem/cilastatin versus piperacillin plus amikacin as empiric therapy in the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients with haematologic malignancies.
Acta Clin Belg. 1989;44(2):99-109. doi: 10.1080/17843286.1989.11717996.
10
Empirical monotherapy with meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin for febrile episodes in neutropenic patients.美罗培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁经验性单药治疗中性粒细胞减少患者发热性发作的比较
Infection. 1996 Nov-Dec;24(6):480-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01713054.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Review of Beta-Lactam vs. Beta-Lactam plus Aminoglycoside Combination Therapy in Neutropenic Cancer Patients.中性粒细胞减少的癌症患者中β-内酰胺类与β-内酰胺类加氨基糖苷类联合治疗的系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 19;16(10):1934. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101934.
2
The cost-effectiveness of empirical antibiotic treatments for high-risk febrile neutropenic patients: A decision analytic model.高危发热性中性粒细胞减少患者经验性抗生素治疗的成本效益:一项决策分析模型。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(20):e20022. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020022.
3
The emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.
造血干细胞移植受者中耐万古霉素肠球菌血症的出现。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2014 Dec;55(12):2858-65. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2014.896007. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
4
Beta-lactam versus beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy in cancer patients with neutropenia.β-内酰胺类药物与β-内酰胺类-氨基糖苷类药物联合治疗癌症中性粒细胞减少症患者的疗效比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 29;2013(6):CD003038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003038.pub2.
5
Imipenem and meropenem: Comparison of in vitro activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials and adverse effects.亚胺培南和美罗培南:体外活性、药代动力学、临床试验及不良反应的比较
Can J Infect Dis. 1998 Jul;9(4):215-28. doi: 10.1155/1998/831425.
6
Low-dose beta-lactam plus amikacin in febrile neutropenia: cefepime vs. piperacillin/tazobactam, a randomized trial.发热性中性粒细胞减少症中低剂量β-内酰胺联合阿米卡星:头孢吡肟与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的随机试验。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Apr;29(4):417-27. doi: 10.1007/s10096-010-0879-1. Epub 2010 Feb 27.
7
Randomized study of cefepime versus ceftazidime plus amikacin in patients with solid tumors treated with high dose chemotherapy (HDC) and peripheral blood stem cell support (PBSCS) with febrile neutropenia.在接受大剂量化疗(HDC)及外周血干细胞支持(PBSCS)并伴有发热性中性粒细胞减少的实体瘤患者中,头孢吡肟与头孢他啶加阿米卡星的随机对照研究。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2006 Dec;8(12):889-95. doi: 10.1007/s12094-006-0152-3.
8
Piperacillin-tazobactam and netilmicin as a safe and efficacious empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic children.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦和奈替米星作为发热性中性粒细胞减少儿童的安全有效经验性治疗药物。
Support Care Cancer. 2004 Oct;12(10):720-4. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0641-2.
9
Management of febrile neutropenia in low risk cancer patients.低风险癌症患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症的管理
Thorax. 2000 Aug;55 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S63-9. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.suppl_1.s63.
10
Cost-effectiveness of ceftazidime or imipenem/cilastatin versus ceftriaxone + aminoglycoside in the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic cancer patients in Germany.德国头孢他啶或亚胺培南/西司他丁与头孢曲松+氨基糖苷类药物治疗中性粒细胞减少癌症患者发热性发作的成本效益
Infection. 1999 Jan-Feb;27(1):23-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02565166.