Duncan Gary H, Albanese Marie-Claire
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Adv Neurol. 2003;93:69-86.
Converging lines of evidence confirm a role for the anterior parietal cortex in pain processing and extend the traditional view of SI to include discriminative aspects of somatic stimulation that is potentially tissue-damaging (e.g., painful). Recent studies more specifically implicate SI in the sensory aspect of pain perception by demonstrating that SI activation is modulated by cognitive manipulations that alter perceived pain intensity, but not by manipulations that alter unpleasantness, independent of pain intensity. Nevertheless, despite the probable role of SI in the encoding of the various sensory features of pain, considerable evidence suggests that nociceptive input to SI may also serve to modulate tactile perception. Thus, SI cortex may be involved in both the perception and modulation of both painful and nonpainful somatosensory sensations. Defining a role in pain processing for the parietal operculum is somewhat more problematic. The absence of a fine somatotopic organization of cutaneous (or visceral) receptors virtually eliminates a substantial role for this region in localizing noxious stimuli. Several studies suggest separate representations for pain and touch within the posterior parietal cortex and SII, respectively; however, inter-species differences in cortical anatomy and inconsistencies in the designation of SII proper preclude a clear reconciliation of the data. Likewise, suggestions that SII activation is predominantly related to processing the nociceptive quality of the stimulus (60,61) are inconsistent with many studies in both human and nonhuman subjects, which show a strong functional relationship between SII activity and innocuous (especially, vibrotactile) stimulation. Nevertheless, the numerous studies indicating pain-related activation within the parietal operculum (and/or SII) underscore the potential importance of this region in the perception of pain and the need for continued research. Finally, a possible role of posterior parietal cortex (BA 5/7, 39/40) in orientation and attention toward painful sensory stimuli is consistent with existing literature describing this region as a poly modal association area concerned with intrapersonal and extrapersonal space; however, results from studies that actually manipulate the subjects' level of attention relative to painful stimuli have not uniformly supported this hypothesis (75). Future studies assessing both attentional demand and direct manipulation or motor interactions involving noxious stimuli may help to resolve this issue. In spite of some discrepant results concerning specific details of the nociceptive process, the weight of human pain research now firmly establishes a role for the parietal lobes in the conscious appreciation of the sensation of pain.
越来越多的证据表明,顶叶前部皮质在疼痛处理中发挥作用,并扩展了体感皮层(SI)的传统观点,将其纳入对潜在组织损伤性(如疼痛性)躯体刺激的辨别方面。最近的研究更具体地表明,SI在疼痛感知的感觉方面发挥作用,通过证明SI的激活受到改变感知疼痛强度的认知操作的调节,但不受改变不愉快感(与疼痛强度无关)的操作的调节。然而,尽管SI可能在疼痛的各种感觉特征编码中发挥作用,但大量证据表明,向SI的伤害性输入也可能用于调节触觉感知。因此,SI皮层可能参与疼痛和非疼痛躯体感觉的感知和调节。确定岛盖部在疼痛处理中的作用则更具问题性。皮肤(或内脏)感受器缺乏精细的躯体定位组织,实际上排除了该区域在定位有害刺激方面的重要作用。几项研究分别表明,顶叶后部皮质和第二体感区(SII)内存在疼痛和触觉的不同表征;然而,物种间皮质解剖结构的差异以及SII确切位置指定的不一致,使得难以对这些数据进行清晰的整合。同样,关于SII激活主要与处理刺激的伤害性性质相关的观点(60,61),与人类和非人类受试者的许多研究不一致,这些研究表明SII活动与无害(特别是振动触觉)刺激之间存在很强的功能关系。尽管如此,众多表明岛盖部(和/或SII)内与疼痛相关激活的研究强调了该区域在疼痛感知中的潜在重要性以及持续研究的必要性。最后,顶叶后部皮质(BA 5/7、39/40)在对疼痛性感觉刺激的定向和注意方面可能发挥的作用,与将该区域描述为涉及个人空间和个人外部空间的多模态联合区的现有文献一致;然而,实际操纵受试者相对于疼痛刺激的注意力水平的研究结果并未一致支持这一假设(75)。未来评估注意力需求以及涉及有害刺激的直接操纵或运动相互作用的研究,可能有助于解决这个问题。尽管关于伤害性过程的具体细节存在一些不一致的结果,但人类疼痛研究的大量证据现在坚定地确立了顶叶在有意识地感知疼痛感觉中的作用。