Suppr超能文献

1990年的医疗保险补充改革立法:十年回顾

Medigap reform legislation of 1990: a 10-year review.

作者信息

Fox Peter D, Snyder Rani E, Rice Thomas

出版信息

Health Care Financ Rev. 2003 Spring;24(3):121-37.

Abstract

The 1990 Medigap reform legislation sought to make it easier for consumers to compare policies, provide market stability, promote competition, and avoid adverse selection. Evidence is that the standardization of benefits has simplified consumer choice and is strongly supported by consumers and State regulators. The 1990 reforms also decreased carrier and agent abuses. However, loss ratios (the proportion of premiums paid in benefits versus being retained for administration and profit) have changed little since 1990, bringing into question whether price competition has been enhanced. The prescription drug benefit, which is included in 3 of the 10 standardized plans, provides only limited financial protection yet is expensive, one reason being adverse selection. Access to coverage for Medicare disabled beneficiaries is problematic in most States.

摘要

1990年的医保补充改革立法旨在让消费者更易于比较保险政策,确保市场稳定,促进竞争,并避免逆向选择。有证据表明,福利标准化简化了消费者的选择,得到了消费者和州监管机构的大力支持。1990年的改革还减少了保险公司和代理商的不当行为。然而,自1990年以来,赔付率(福利支付的保费比例与用于管理和利润留存的比例)变化不大,这让人质疑价格竞争是否得到了加强。10个标准化计划中有3个包含处方药福利,该福利仅提供有限的经济保护,但成本高昂,其中一个原因是逆向选择。在大多数州,医疗保险残疾受益人的保险覆盖存在问题。

相似文献

1
Medigap reform legislation of 1990: a 10-year review.
Health Care Financ Rev. 2003 Spring;24(3):121-37.
2
Medigap reform legislation of 1990: have the objectives been met?
Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):157-74.
4
Medigap regulation: lessons for health care reform.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1995 Spring;20(1):31-48. doi: 10.1215/03616878-20-1-31.
5
Private, individual drug coverage in the current Medicare market.
Policy Brief Commonw Fund. 2003 Oct(679):1-10.
6
Government and private insurance medical programs as well as MDVIP, an update.
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2004;14(3):243-50. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v14.i3.80.
8
Estimation of a hedonic pricing model for Medigap insurance.
Health Serv Res. 2006 Dec;41(6):2097-113. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00591.x.
9

引用本文的文献

1
The Shadow Price of Uncertainty: Consequences of Unpredictable Insurance Coverage for Access, Care, and Financial Security.
Milbank Q. 2025 Jun;103(2):440-479. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.70006. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
3
How much choice is too much? The case of the Medicare prescription drug benefit.
Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1157-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00981.x. Epub 2009 May 26.
4
Estimation of a hedonic pricing model for Medigap insurance.
Health Serv Res. 2006 Dec;41(6):2097-113. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00591.x.
5
Can limiting choice increase social welfare? The elderly and health insurance.
Milbank Q. 2006;84(1):37-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2006.00438.x.
6
Prescription drug benefits: cost management issues for Medicare.
Health Care Financ Rev. 2003 Winter;25(2):7-21.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验