Csanádi Zoltán, Fazekas Tamás, Varró András
Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Szent-Györgyi Albert Orvos- és Gyógyszerésztudományi Centrum, Altalános Orvostudományi Kar, II. Belgyógyászati Klinika és Kardiológiai Központ.
Orv Hetil. 2003 Jun 29;144(26):1279-89.
The authors provide an update on non-pharmacological treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). They emphasize that although antiarrhythmic drugs continue to be first-line therapy for the arrhythmia considered to be a cardiovascular epidemic, clinical research to develop non-pharmacological means of treatment has been unprecedentally intensified during the last decade. Electrical cardioversion is the most successful non-pharmacological method to restore sinus rhythm, also the efficacy and safety of AV node ablation for palliative ventricular rate-controll is established. "Hybrid" therapeutic procedures, involving combinations of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions have gained widespread use. Curative transcatheter ablation for arrhythmia prevention is to be considered in case of clinical suggestions that AF is initiated by a primary regular arrhythmia that is amenable to routine catheter ablation (secondary AF). Despite encouraging results, at this point in time, curative catheter ablation for primary AF may offer significant improvement or even cure only for a small subset of patients, mostly young individuals with normal heart, and paroxysmal AF with frequent, symptomatic episodes refractory to multiple antiarrhythmic drugs. These interventions are to be performed in the settings of a clinical research project in some institutions. Regarding pacemaker therapy in case of bradycardia indication, physiologic pacing (AAI or DDD) is associated with significantly lower incidence of atrial fibrillation than ventricular pacing. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the clinical value of specially designed implantable devices to prevent atrial fibrillation in patients with no conventional bradycardia indication. Also, technical optimization and proper clinical evaluation is needed for implantable atrioverters and implantable cardioverter defibrillators capable of atrial cardioversion therapy.
作者提供了心房颤动(AF)非药物治疗的最新情况。他们强调,尽管抗心律失常药物仍然是被视为心血管流行病的心律失常的一线治疗方法,但在过去十年中,开发非药物治疗手段的临床研究得到了前所未有的加强。电复律是恢复窦性心律最成功的非药物方法,房室结消融用于姑息性心室率控制的疗效和安全性也已得到确立。涉及药物和非药物干预相结合的“混合”治疗程序已得到广泛应用。对于临床提示AF由可通过常规导管消融治疗的原发性规则心律失常引发(继发性AF)的情况,应考虑采用根治性经导管消融预防心律失常。尽管取得了令人鼓舞的结果,但目前,原发性AF的根治性导管消融可能仅对一小部分患者有显著改善甚至治愈效果,这些患者大多是心脏正常的年轻人以及对阵发性AF且频繁发作、症状明显且对多种抗心律失常药物难治的患者。在一些机构中,这些干预措施是在临床研究项目的背景下进行的。关于心动过缓适应症的起搏器治疗,生理性起搏(AAI或DDD)与心房颤动的发生率显著低于心室起搏相关。需要进行大规模随机对照试验来评估专门设计的可植入设备对无传统心动过缓适应症患者预防心房颤动的临床价值。此外,对于能够进行心房复律治疗的可植入心房除颤器和可植入心脏复律除颤器,需要进行技术优化和适当的临床评估。