Suppr超能文献

心理治疗中的疗效研究与效果研究:对临床催眠的启示

Efficacy vs. effectiveness research in psychotherapy: implications for clinical hypnosis.

作者信息

Amundson Jon K, Alladin Assen, Eamon Gill

机构信息

Regional Health Authority, Calgary, Alberta.

出版信息

Am J Clin Hypn. 2003 Jul;46(1):11-29. doi: 10.1080/00029157.2003.10403562.

Abstract

Empirically supported therapy (EST) has become a major focus and trend for mental health practice. When hypnosis is involved, this may mean satisfying a standard that is entirely too narrow in its emphasis. In this article "efficacy"-based research in clinical practice is contrasted with "effectiveness" -focused research, and they are discussed from the perspective of hypnosis. When clinicians can consider trans-theoretical factors as well as those that are treatment-enhancing, possibilities for improved treatment outcome increase. The "effectiveness" perspective also serves as a counter point for hypnosis in contrast with the dubious efficacy-based gold standard currently proposed for therapy in general, and hypnosis in particular.

摘要

实证支持疗法(EST)已成为心理健康实践的主要焦点和趋势。当涉及催眠时,这可能意味着要满足一个在重点方面过于狭隘的标准。在本文中,临床实践中基于“疗效”的研究与以“有效性”为重点的研究形成对比,并从催眠的角度进行了讨论。当临床医生能够考虑跨理论因素以及那些增强治疗效果的因素时,改善治疗结果的可能性就会增加。与目前一般疗法尤其是催眠疗法所提出的可疑的基于疗效的金标准相比,“有效性”视角也为催眠提供了一个相反的观点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验