Suppr超能文献

婴儿恐惧和认知表现的个体差异:测试、表现还是能力效应?

Individual differences in infant fearfulness and cognitive performance: a testing, performance, or competence effect?

作者信息

Rieser-Danner Loretta A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, West Chester University of Pennsylvania, 19383-2145, USA.

出版信息

Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 2003 Feb;129(1):41-71.

Abstract

The author conducted 2 studies to examine the relations between infant fear and cognitive testing performance in 12-month-old infants. In Study 1, fear was assessed by using 2 standard temperament questionnaires and a laboratory-based, standardized stranger approach. Individual differences in cognitive development were assessed using the Object Permanence Scale of the Infant Psychological Development Scales (I. C. Uzgiris & J. M. Hunt, 1975). All 3 assessments of fear significantly predicted object permanence performance, with correlations ranging from -.32 to -.35. In Study 2, fear was assessed via a maternal report questionnaire, and habituation performance was assessed via a basic-level categorization task. Familiarity with the examiner and with the testing environment was manipulated to test for a familiarity influence on performance. Testing revealed individual differences in both fear and habituation. Results suggest that highly fearful infants required more trials to habituate and were less likely to meet the habituation criterion than infants who were less fearful. Methodological and conceptual implications of these results are discussed.

摘要

作者进行了两项研究,以检验12个月大婴儿的恐惧与认知测试表现之间的关系。在研究1中,通过使用两份标准气质问卷和一种基于实验室的标准化陌生人接近方式来评估恐惧。使用《婴儿心理发展量表》(I.C.乌兹吉里斯和J.M.亨特,1975年)的客体永久性量表来评估认知发展的个体差异。所有三项恐惧评估都显著预测了客体永久性表现,相关系数在-0.32至-0.35之间。在研究2中,通过一份母亲报告问卷来评估恐惧,通过一项基本水平分类任务来评估习惯化表现。对与考官和测试环境的熟悉程度进行了操控,以测试熟悉程度对表现的影响。测试揭示了恐惧和习惯化方面的个体差异。结果表明,与恐惧程度较低的婴儿相比,高度恐惧的婴儿需要更多的试验来实现习惯化,并且更不太可能达到习惯化标准。讨论了这些结果在方法学和概念上的意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验