• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨形式启动中的语义类别差异。

Semantic category differences in cross-form priming.

作者信息

Gold David, Beauregard Mario, Lecours Andre Roch, Chertkow Howard

机构信息

Centre de Recherche, Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

出版信息

J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003 Jul;9(5):796-805. doi: 10.1017/S1355617703950120.

DOI:10.1017/S1355617703950120
PMID:12901785
Abstract

Findings of category-specific impairments have suggested that human semantic memory may be organized around a living/nonliving dichotomy. In order to assess implicit memory performance for living and nonliving concepts, one group of neurologically intact individuals participated in a cross-form conceptual priming paradigm. In Block 1, pictures primed words while in Block 2 words were used to prime pictures. Across all phases of the experiment, subjects decided whether items represented something which was living or nonliving, and response times were recorded. Results revealed greater priming for living concepts across both blocks. Greater priming for living concepts may have occurred because of increased or prolonged conceptual activation of these concepts. Results are discussed in the context of theoretical accounts of the category-specific impairments observed in brain-damaged populations.

摘要

特定类别损伤的研究结果表明,人类语义记忆可能围绕有生命/无生命的二分法进行组织。为了评估对有生命和无生命概念的内隐记忆表现,一组神经功能正常的个体参与了一种跨形式概念启动范式。在第1组中,图片启动单词,而在第2组中,单词用于启动图片。在实验的所有阶段,受试者要判断项目是否代表有生命或无生命的事物,并记录反应时间。结果显示,在两个组中对有生命概念的启动作用更大。对有生命概念的启动作用更大可能是因为这些概念的概念激活增加或延长。本文将结合在脑损伤人群中观察到的特定类别损伤的理论解释来讨论这些结果。

相似文献

1
Semantic category differences in cross-form priming.跨形式启动中的语义类别差异。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003 Jul;9(5):796-805. doi: 10.1017/S1355617703950120.
2
Repetition-priming modulates category-related effects on event-related potentials: further evidence for multiple cortical semantic systems.重复启动调节与类别相关的事件相关电位效应:多个皮层语义系统的进一步证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Feb;17(2):199-211. doi: 10.1162/0898929053124938.
3
Perceptual priming is not a necessary consequence of semantic classification of pictures.知觉启动并非图片语义分类的必然结果。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2000 May;53(2):289-323. doi: 10.1080/713755893.
4
Longitudinal profiles of semantic impairment for living and nonliving concepts in dementia of Alzheimer's type.阿尔茨海默病型痴呆中关于有生命和无生命概念的语义损伤纵向概况。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 Oct 1;13(7):892-909. doi: 10.1162/089892901753165818.
5
Semantic processing of living and nonliving concepts across the cerebral hemispheres.大脑两半球对生物和非生物概念的语义加工
Brain Lang. 2005 Jul;94(1):86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.12.001. Epub 2005 Jan 28.
6
Dual access to semantics in autism: is pictorial access superior to verbal access?
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2000 Oct;41(7):859-67.
7
Primacy of functional knowledge in semantic representations: the case of living and nonliving things.语义表征中功能知识的首要性:关于生物与非生物的案例
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Nov;59(11):1984-2009. doi: 10.1080/17470210600576300.
8
ERP analyses of task effects on semantic processing from words.对单词语义加工任务效应的事件相关电位分析。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 May;23(2-3):293-305. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.10.016. Epub 2004 Dec 23.
9
Automatic semantic priming in the left and right hemispheres.左右半球的自动语义启动
Scand J Psychol. 2007 Jun;48(3):197-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00557.x.
10
Do living and nonliving categories need further fractionation? A study of picture naming in a pathological sample.生物和非生物类别需要进一步细分吗?对一个病理样本中的图片命名进行的一项研究。
Brain Cogn. 2000 Jun-Aug;43(1-3):291-6.